Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Home | Support RFF | Join E-mail List | Contact
RFF Logo
Skip navigation links
RESEARCH TOPICS
CENTERS
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
EVENTS
RESEARCHERS
ABOUT RFF
 

 

 
Join E-mail List
Please provide your e-mail address to receive periodic newsletters and invitations to public events
 
 

A Model for Manure – and Markets
RFF Feature
May 8, 2009

Animal wastes from dairy farms, cattle feedlots, and other livestock operations generate huge amounts of methane, a key greenhouse gas, as well as ammonia, a chemical that creates fine airborne particulates that harm human health. In recent years, policy makers have sought to encourage livestock operations to adopt technologies or farm practices that could reduce these harmful agricultural emissions.

In a recent paper, RFF researchers looked into the policy options to capture of methane and turn it into valuable electricity. Using an integrated process economic model, they identified market incentives that could be used to reduce the harmful emissions – thus providing climate and health benefits – and generate electrical power as well. Three specific policy options are explored: greenhouse gas offset credits for methane control, particulate matter offset credits for ammonia control, and expanded net metering policies to provide revenue for the sale of electricity generated from captured methane gas.

The paper, by Jhih-Shyang Shih, Dallas Burtraw, Karen Palmer, and Juha Siikamäki, was published in JAWMA, the Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (September 2008). The report was updated from an earlier paper published by RFF entitled “Air Emissions of Ammonia and Methane from Livestock Operations: Valuation and Policy Options” (2006).

The study focused on California, the nation’s top dairy state, which produces about one-fifth of all U.S. milk production. Each year, cows in that state produce 70 billion tons of manure – more solid organic waste than the state’s 35 million humans generate.

By using large manure capture tanks known as digesters, the authors note, dairy farms can generate and collect biogas that can be burned for heat or to run electricity generators. Not only does the process produce extra income for dairy farmers, but it curbs releases of ammonia and methane into the atmosphere.

Such practices are being used increasingly across the country. A 2008 article in The New York Times profiled a dairy farm in Vermont with more than 1,000 cows. Waste from their dairy and the nearby Ben & Jerry’s ice cream plant enable the farm hourly produce 250 to 300 kilowatt of electricity, enough to power around 350 homes.

In their JAWMA paper, the authors cite a California dairy that could generate more than 56,000 kilowatt hours a month – enough to power the entire operation and a surplus to sell to the electricity grid.

Their findings, the authors note, “will be essential to future public policymaking that may give rise to new markets for emissions reductions or to direct financial and technical assistance for emissions control technologies in agriculture. The institutions we characterize and the incentives they would provide are natural extensions of recent evolution in environmental and agricultural policy and could improve the efficiency of emissions management from a social perspective.”

    

Jhih-Shyang Shih
Jhih-Shyang Shih

Dallas Burtraw
Dallas Burtraw

Karen Palmer
Karen Palmer

Juha Siikamaki
Juha Siikamäki


Air Emissions of Ammonia and Methane from Livestock Operations

RFF Home | RFF Press: An Imprint of Routledge Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Copyright Notice
1616 P St. NW, Washington, DC 20036 · 202.328.5000 Feedback | Contact Us