The Outdoor Resources Review Group
Resources for the Future Background Study
|The Outdoor Recreation Resources Review Commission (ORRRC) recognized these facts in 1962, as did the Outdoor Recreation Policy Review Group in 1983 and the 1987 President’s Commission on Americans Outdoors. These groups provided rigorous and thought-provoking reviews of the status of America’s outdoor recreation resources and identified emerging needs. The studies led to significant new federal programs and increased attention to conservation, open space, and recreation resources.
The most recent of these studies is now more than 20 years old. Much has changed in the American landscape and many new concerns have arisen that indicate the need for a new review. In this study, we plan to undertake such a review.We focus the review on issues related to outdoor recreation demand, recreation supply, values and funding trends, and emerging issues and concerns in recreation, conservation, and open space.
Demand for Outdoor Recreation Visitation to national parks in the U.S. has remained steady since the late 1980s, though on a per capita basis, visitation has declined slightly. On the other hand, visits to other types of public lands have risen. For example, National Wildlife Refuges have seen a steady increase, as have National Forests. And some data suggests that National Trails and Heritage Areas have become increasingly popular. It is time to take a closer look at the demand for visits and recreation on our public lands with an eye to how demand is likely to change in the future.
In addition, broader surveys of outdoor recreation more generally provide some critical information. The National Survey on Recreation and the Environment, conducted by the Forest Service in partnership with two universities, gives a useful picture on recreation trends nationwide since the 1960s. Similarly, the Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation Survey, conducted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, has been carried out for many years and provides good information on trends in wildlife-based recreation.
We will trace the patterns of participation in various kinds of outdoor recreation activities, calling on data and information from these surveys and others (some private organizations also conduct surveys). In addition, we will analyze how population growth, changes in the demographics of the population, increasing urbanization, changes in household incomes and the widening distribution of incomes all affect recreation demand and how those trends will affect recreation in the future. Likewise, we will look at the advances in technology that have taken place since the 1980s and the increases in availability of competing leisure activities and assess how these changes have affected outdoor recreation demand and are likely to do so in the future. Finally, special trends such as the growth in eco-tourism, agro-tourism, and most recently, a phenomenon that the National Geographic is calling geo-tourism all affect the demand for outdoor recreation. We will discuss these special trends as well.
The Value of Outdoor Recreation Tracking participation and visits to parks and natural areas is useful, but a question that may be more important is the value of these resources. Valuation of a nonmarket good such as outdoor recreation must call on methods pioneered by Marion Clawson in the late 1950s that relied on travel costs as estimates of willingness to pay. Since that time, surveys, data, and estimation techniques have become increasingly sophisticated, but the basic principle of the approach remains the same. We will discuss the large body of literature that is available on the topic and describe remaining gaps. For example, a recent review covering nearly 600 studies finds many values for some activities such as fishing but very few for others such as bird watching, mountain biking, and off-road vehicle riding, all activities that participation surveys show have grown in importance in recent years.
Outdoor Recreation Supply Federal lands make up almost 21 percent of the total area of the lower 48 states and 42% of lands west of the 100th meridian. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management lands account for much of these western lands and not all acreage is available for recreation. Some recent studies show, however, that recreation values on these lands are high and rising; in some cases, recreation values appear to be greater than the value of livestock grazing, a significant and often controversial activity on BLM lands.
Growth in acreage in the federal estate has been limited, but special designations such as wilderness and national rivers have increased appreciably since the 1980s. Recently, the National Trails System and National Heritage Areas have rapidly expanded. Moreover, state park systems have grown substantially nationwide.
To understand whether and how supply meets demand, we will look at acreage of different kinds of parks, open space, and recreation resources and the location of those lands. New advances in Geographic Information System (GIS) software allow for a more careful look at land uses than was possible 20 years ago. We will also document and discuss trends such as the larger role now played by state and local governments, by land trusts, and by private actors. In addition, we will look at the role played by private lands and commercial provision of recreation. With conservation easements and other restrictions on development growing in popularity, the potential for recreation opportunities on privately-owned land may be growing. However, many issues remain with how those lands are managed and the degree of public access.
Funding A number of important concerns about funding of parks, open spaces, and recreation resources exist and deserve further study. It will be important to track the trends in federal funding since the last review, including trends in funding for our most important resources such as national parks, as well as the Land and Water Conservation Fund, and other agencies such as the Forest Service. It will also be key to look more closely at the exact nature of the funding for some of these agencies. For example, recreation has become increasingly important on Forest Service lands, but much of the spending goes toward fire fighting and other activities. LWCF funding is split between federal land and water acquisition and grants to states; how has this changed over time? And money for preservation of open space has come from a diverse set of federal sources in recent years, including provisions in the transportation and farm bills. Analyzing how these funds are spent will be worthwhile. Finally, on the federal level, there has been a lack of coordination in funding, which we will address in this study.
Another funding trend that has occurred since the last outdoor recreation review is the movement toward state and local ballot initiatives to fund various conservation programs, including those specifically for recreation. Both the number of referenda and the dollar amounts of funding approved have risen over time. We will explore the factors that seem to be explaining this movement and attempt to uncover where and how these monies are being spent.
Emerging Issues There are a variety of new concerns on the horizon with respect to outdoor recreation resources. We briefly discuss the issues we will focus on in this study.
- Health concerns Some studies have established a link, though a somewhat tenuous one, between land development patterns and obesity. In particular, sprawling development patterns without sidewalks, parks, and communal open space may be contributing to obesity. Also, parks, trees, and open space contribute to cleaner air and water which has positive health effects. In general, there may be evidence on a link between health and access to the outdoors. We will discuss findings in this area.
- Children and access to nature Similar to the concerns over health in general, some experts have decried the “nature deficit” experienced by children in the U.S. these days. Literature on the topic is growing and we will summarize the findings and discuss the nature of the problem, if it exists.
- Tensions and synergies between conservation and recreation Natural areas and parks often provide the dual benefits of recreation and conservation. Wetlands, for example, provide wildlife habitat, floodwater retention, filtration of nutrients, and a variety of other ecosystem services, but they also can provide recreation benefits in the form of bird watching and duck hunting. But in many cases, there can be tensions among uses. What recreation activities should be allowed in wilderness areas is a source of debate, for example. We will address the issues here and discuss the literature on valuation with respect to this topic.
- Tensions and synergies on public lands Public lands provide a range of uses but oftentimes those uses conflict with one another. Livestock grazing on BLM and Forest Service lands is one example; the damage that is done to riparian areas, the degradation of streams, weed infestations, and damage to wildlife in areas that have high value for recreation is a source of tension. Off-road vehicle use has become a popular recreation activity on some BLM and Forest Service lands, yet the vehicles can damage fragile resources. We will document and discuss these concerns and analyze potential remedies.
- Special problems of urban areas Approximately 80% of the U.S. population lives in urban areas. Although open space, parks, and recreation areas in close proximity to people’s homes may be highly valuable, city parks in the U.S. are uneven in quality both within and across cities. We will discuss trends in quality and quantity of parks, patterns and trends in funding, and special issues associated with the “smart growth” movement and with so-called “brownfields.”
- Climate change No discussion of environment and natural resources today is complete without an examination of the implications of climate change. We will assess climate change impacts on recreation resources, including issues associated with sea level rise, drought, and wildfires. We also will look at the ability of forests and conservation resources to reduce the impact of rising greenhouse gas emissions and the important role for offsets policy.