Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Home | Support RFF | Join E-mail List | Contact
RFF Logo
Skip navigation links
RESEARCH TOPICS
CENTERS
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
EVENTS
RESEARCHERS
ABOUT RFF
 

 

 
Join E-mail List
Please provide your e-mail address to receive periodic newsletters and invitations to public events
 
 

Time for an Ecosystem Approach to the Endangered Species Act?
RFF Feature
July 13, 2010

 

Time for an Ecosystem Approach to the Endangered Species Act?

Efforts to prevent the extinction of imperiled plant and animal species were overwhelmingly approved by Congress in 1973. With the passage of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), procedures were established to identify, list, and protect threatened wildlife and plants.

But since its enactment, the Act has been among the nation’s most controversial laws, generating legal challenges from state and local governments, conservationists, farmers and ranchers, and business owners. Through development of tools like Safe Harbor Agreements, which create regulatory assurances for landowners that protect at-risk species, many disincentives for private stewardship under the Act have been addressed. Other challenges, however, remain.

In Reshaping the Endangered Species Act: A Holistic Approach Needed? RFF Visiting Scholar Lynn Scarlett explores some of the modern challenges to the success of the ESA.

Scarlett finds that three key policy issues affect the success of the ESA:

  • How to coordinate stewardship actions of multiple land owners across different jurisdictions and property boundaries
  • How to resolve the tension between the species-by-species focus of the ESA and the realities of the natural world where species have interconnected relationships within ecosystems
  • Strengthening ways to incorporate both science and the practical experiences of resource managers into recovery planning and protection of threatened and endangered species

Collaborative programs from across the country provide insights into how to tackle the problems of coordination and the need to include both science and practical experience into recovery planning, according to Scarlett. She cites, for example, a program in the Upper Colorado River region that provides technical and financial incentives to private landowners for their contributions to ecosystem-wide management programs. Other examples of successful coordination abound and could be used as the building blocks for enhancing ESA implementation, she notes.  The recent  ESA listing of 48 species in Kauai in a single action by the Fish and Wildlife Service provides a first step to addressing the third challenge of how to create an ecosystem-based approach to listing and protecting species.

Related Material

Endangered Species: Progress and Pitfalls During Three Decades of Controversy
A Conversation with Michael Bean and Carolyn Fischer

RFF Home | RFF Press: An Imprint of Routledge Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Copyright Notice
1616 P St. NW, Washington, DC 20036 · 202.328.5000 Feedback | Contact Us