Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Home | Support RFF | Join E-mail List | Contact
RFF Logo
Skip navigation links
RESEARCH TOPICS
CENTERS
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
EVENTS
RESEARCHERS
ABOUT RFF
 

 

 
Join E-mail List
Please provide your e-mail address to receive periodic newsletters and invitations to public events
 
 
The Market-based Lead Phasedown
Richard G. Newell, Kristian Rogers
RFF Discussion Paper 03-37 | November 2003
RESEARCH TOPICS:
Abstract
The U.S. lead phasedown was effective in meeting its environmental objectives, and did so morequickly with the allowance of permit banking. The marketable lead permit system was highly costeffective,saving hundreds of millions of dollars relative to comparable policies not allowing trading orbanking. Estimates suggest that transaction costs brought about only a modest reduction in programefficiency. The market-based nature of the program also provided incentives for more efficient adoptionof new lead-removing technology, relative to a uniform standard. Distributionally, it is likely that theprogram was actually more responsive to the cost concerns of small refiners than a similar uniformstandard would have been. The flexibility of the program likely increased the amount of violations,however, and added an unexpected monitoring and enforcement burden. On the other hand, one of theefficiency advantages of the incentive-based program is that it provided opportunities for unanticipatedmeans of cost-effective compliance.
RELATED SUBTOPICS
Gasoline
RFF Home | RFF Press: An Imprint of Routledge Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Copyright Notice
1616 P St. NW, Washington, DC 20036 ยท 202.328.5000 Feedback | Contact Us