Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Home | Support RFF | Join E-mail List | Contact
RFF Logo
Skip navigation links


Join E-mail List
Please provide your e-mail address to receive periodic newsletters and invitations to public events
Corporate Codes of Conduct: Is CommonEnvironmental Content Feasible?
Carolyn Fischer, Ian W.H. Parry, Francisco Aguilar, Puja Jawahar
RFF Discussion Paper 05-09 | March 2005
In a developing country context, a policy to promote adoption of common environmental content forcorporate codes of conduct (COCs) aspires to meaningful results on two fronts. First, adherence to COCprovisions should offer economic benefits that exceed the costs of compliance; i.e., companies mustreceive a price premium, market expansion, efficiency gains, subsidized technical assistance, or somecombination of these benefits in return for meeting the requirements. Second, compliance should producesignificant improvements in environmental outcomes; i.e., the code must impose real requirements, andmonitoring and enforcement must offer sufficient incentives to prevent evasion. With those goals in mind,we explore options for establishing common environmental content in voluntary COCs. Because thebenefits of a COC rest on its ability to signal information, we ground our analysis in a review ofexperiences with a broad range of voluntary (and involuntary) information-based programs: not onlyexisting corporate COCs, but also the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) family ofstandards, ecolabels, and information disclosure programs. We find some important tradeoffs betweenharmonization, applicability, feasibility, and efficacy.
RFF Home | RFF Press: An Imprint of Routledge Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Copyright Notice
1616 P St. NW, Washington, DC 20036 ยท 202.328.5000 Feedback | Contact Us