| PUBLICATIONS | | Filtered by Daniel F. Morris | | | | | Sort by: Title | Date | Results per page: |
| | Progressing to a Fair Carbon Tax: Policy Design Options and Impacts to Households | | Daniel F. Morris, Clayton Munnings | | 13-03 | April 2013 | | | | | | Blue Carbon: Global Options for Reducing Emissions from the Degradation and Development of Coastal Ecosystems | | Juha V. Siikamäki, James N. Sanchirico, Sunny Jardine, David W McLaughlin, Daniel F. Morris | | RFF Report | November 2012 | | | | | | Climate Policy, International Trade, and Emissions Leakage | | Juha V. Siikamäki, Clayton Munnings, Jeffrey Ferris, Daniel F. Morris | | Backgrounder | November 2012 | | | | | | Modeling the Electricity Sector: A Summary of Recent Analyses of New EPA Regulations | | Blair Beasley, Daniel F. Morris | | RFF Discussion Paper 12-52 | November 2012 | | Abstract: Several different economic models have been applied to try to understand how new regulations by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) could impact coal-fired generation in the United States as well as the electricity system as a whole. This paper provides an overview of many of the key studies and the models used to analyze the potential impacts of EPA’s rules. The regulations surveyed include the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR), the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS), the proposed Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 316(b) rule, and the proposed Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) rule. The models generally agree that these regulations will result in coal plant retirements, though there is far less agreement on how much generation may retire. Assumptions about the price of natural gas and the expected stringency of regulations play a key role in determining modeling results. The models provide useful guidance for policymakers when considering the potential impact of EPA regulation. | | | | Mapping Adaptation Opportunities and Activities in an Interactive Atlas | | Morris, Daniel F. and Nisha Krishnan | | AMBIO | February 2012 | Vol. 41, No. 1 Supplement | pp. 90-99 | | | | | | Setting the Carbon Bar: Measurement, Reporting, and Verification in Bilateral Forestry Agreements | | Daniel F. Morris, Anne Riddle | | Issue Brief 11-11 | September 2011 | | | | | | Importing Climate Mitigation: The Potential and Challenges of International Forest Offsets in California Climate Policy | | Daniel F. Morris, Nathan Richardson, Anne Riddle | | Issue Brief 11-12 | September 2011 | | | | | | REDD+ and International Climate Finance: A Brief Primer | | Daniel F. Morris, Andrew R Stevenson | | Issue Brief 11-13 | September 2011 | | | | | | Resources Magazine: 178 | | Wolfram Schlenker, James N. Sanchirico, Molly K. Macauley, Daniel F. Morris, James W. Boyd, Alan J. Krupnick, Ian W.H. Parry, Phil Sharp | | Resources | Summer 2011 (178) | | | | | | Climate Change in the United States: Expected Environmental Impacts and Necessary Federal Action | | Molly K. Macauley, Daniel F. Morris | | Resources | Summer 2011 (178) | | | | | | How Communities and Countries Can Adapt to Climate Change | | Daniel F. Morris | | Resources | Summer 2011 (178) | | | | | | A Whole-of-Government Approach to Reducing Tropical Deforestation | | Michael Wolosin, Anne Riddle, Daniel F. Morris | | RFF Discussion Paper 11-28 | July 2011 | | Abstract: Tropical forests provide critical global and local ecosystem services and habitat for many of the world’s plants and animals. Their loss threatens the sustainable economic growth and social stability of developing countries, and illegal deforestation abroad places U.S. producers at an unfair disadvantage. For these and other reasons, the United States has long been engaged in programs to reduce forest loss. This engagement has recently increased, with the new Presidential Global Climate Change Initiative including a pillar dedicated to slowing forest loss. While promising, this new funding and coordination is insufficient, with a narrow focus on climate-based development assistance. Engaging the full suite of forest policy levers in the federal government, or taking a “whole-of-government” approach, would provide greater immediate impact in preventing forest loss while building the foundations of a working landscape ethic. In this discussion paper, we explore the opportunities to expand U.S. contributions to reducing tropical deforestation through this approach. A whole-of-government approach to international deforestation consists of coordinating and focusing the programs across the federal government that could reduce the rate of tropical forest loss. It is an integrated strategy that employs existing activities and authorities of the U.S. government and directs them under an overarching goal of reducing deforestation in tropical forest countries, while continuing to support other developing-country goals, such as economic development, health, food security, and biodiversity. We identify three major areas where policy adjustments and actions by relevant authorities can have immediate and tangible impact on reducing deforestation. | | | | Reforming Institutions and Managing Extremes U.S. Policy Approaches for Adapting to a Changing Climate | | Daniel F. Morris, Molly K. Macauley, Raymond J. Kopp, Richard D. Morgenstern | | RFF Report | May 2011 | | | | | | Resources Magazine | | Joseph E. Aldy, John W. Anderson, Lynann Butkiewicz, Mark A Cohen, Roger M. Cooke, Arthur G. Fraas, Madeline Gottlieb, Kristin Hayes, Carolyn Kousky, Joshua Linn, Molly K. Macauley, Richard D. Morgenstern, Daniel F. Morris, Timothy Murphy, Nigel Purvis, Leslie Richardson, Nathan Richardson, Heather L. Ross, P. Lynn Scarlett, Adam Stern, Andrew R Stevenson | | Resources | Winter/Spring 2011 (177) | | | | | | Geographically Prioritizing Appropriations for the Sustainable Landscapes Program | | Daniel F. Morris, Jonah Busch, Fred Boltz | | Issue Brief 11-01 | February 2011 | | | | | | Adapting to Climate Change:The Public Policy Response | | Daniel F. Morris, Molly K. Macauley, Raymond J. Kopp, Richard D. Morgenstern, Tiffany Clements | | Issue Brief 10-19 | November 2010 | | | | | | Feasibility Assessment of a Carbon Cap-and-Trade System for Mexico | | Dallas Burtraw, Raymond J. Kopp, Richard D. Morgenstern, Daniel F. Morris, Elizabeth Topping | | RFF Report | July 2010 | | | | | | Why We Need Accurate Maps of the World’s Forests | | Daniel F. Morris, Molly K. Macauley, Roger A. Sedjo | | Resources | Winter 2010 (174) | | | | | | Forest Measurement and Monitoring: Technical Capacity and “How Good Is Good Enough?” | | Molly K. Macauley, Daniel F. Morris, Roger A. Sedjo, Kate Farley, Brent L. Sohngen | | RFF Report | December 2009 | | | | | | Climate Change and Outdoor Recreation Resources | | Daniel F. Morris, Margaret A. Walls | | RFF Backgrounder | April 2009 | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
| FILTER PUBLICATIONS | | By Topic | | | By Type | | | By Author | | | | Display All Publications |
|
|
|
|
|