| PUBLICATIONS | | Filtered by Elisheba Beia Spiller | | | | | Sort by: Title | Date | Results per page: |
| | Shale Gas Development and the Costs of Groundwater Contamination Risk | | Lucija Anna Muehlenbachs, Elisheba Beia Spiller, Chris Timmins | | RFF Discussion Paper 12-40-REV | March 2013 | | Abstract: While shale gas development can result in rapid local economic development, negative externalities associated with the process may adversely affect the prices of nearby homes. We utilize a difference-in-differences estimator with additional controls for house fixed effects and the boundary of the public water service area in Washington County, Pennsylvania to identify the capitalization of groundwater contamination risk in property values, differentiating it from other externalities, lease payments to homeowners, and local economic development. We find that proximity to wells increases property values. However, groundwater contamination concerns fully offset those gains by reducing property values up to 26 percent. | | | | Goings On | | James Smith, Anthony Paul, Carolyn Fischer, James W. Boyd, Elisheba Beia Spiller, Sheila M. Olmstead, Molly K. Macauley, Phil Sharp, Carolyn Kousky, Raymond J. Kopp, Dallas Burtraw, Alan J. Krupnick, Yusuke Kuwayama , P. Lynn Scarlett, Karen L. Palmer | | Resources | 2012 (181) | | | | | | Evaluating “Cash-for-Clunkers: Program Effects on Auto Sales and the Environment | | Shanjun Li, Joshua Linn, and Elisheba Spiller | | Journal of Environmental Economics and Management | forthcoming | Related Discussion Paper 10-39-REV | | | | | | The Heterogeneous Effects of Gasoline Taxes: Why Where We Live Matters | | Elisheba Beia Spiller, Heather M. Stephens | | RFF Discussion Paper 12-30 | July 2012 | | Abstract: Using disaggregated confidential household data, we estimate spatial variation in household-level gasoline price elasticities and the welfare effects of gasoline taxes. A novel approach allows us to model a discrete-continuous household choice of vehicle bundles, while disaggregating the choice set and including vehicle-specific fixed effects and unobserved consumer heterogeneity. The mean elasticity of demand for gasoline is -0.67, but with tremendous variation across location and income. We find that rural households have 30 percent more negative welfare impacts than urban households from gasoline taxes. Finally, we explore different policies that can help to mitigate welfare inequalities due to these taxes. | | | | Inside RFF | | Molly K. Macauley, Alan J. Krupnick, Yusuke Kuwayama , Carolyn Kousky, Elisheba Beia Spiller, Roger M. Cooke, James W. Boyd, Jintao Xu, Jared Carbone, James Smith, W. Reed Walker, Michael Madowitz, Alison Sexton, Junjie Zhang | | Resources | 2012 (179) | | | | | | Evaluating “Cash-for-Clunkers: Program Effects on Auto Sales and the Environment | | Shanjun Li, Joshua Linn, Elisheba Beia Spiller | | RFF Discussion Paper 10-39-REV | October 2011 | | Related journal article | | Abstract: “Cash-for-Clunkers” was a $3 billion program that attempted to stimulate the U.S. economy and improve the environment by encouraging consumers to retire older vehicles and purchase more fuel-efficient new vehicles. We investigate the effects of this program on new vehicle sales and the environment. Using Canada as the control group in a difference-in-differences framework, we find that the program increased new vehicle sales by about 0.36 million during July and August of 2009, implying that approximately 45 percent of the spending went to consumers who would have purchased a new vehicle anyway. Our results suggest no gain in sales beyond 2009 and hence no meaningful stimulus to the economy. In addition, the program will reduce CO2 emissions by only 9 to 28.4 million tons, implying a cost per ton ranging from $91 to $288 even after accounting for reduced criteria pollutants. | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
| FILTER PUBLICATIONS | | By Topic | | | By Type | | | By Author | | | | Display All Publications |
|
|
|
|
|