| PUBLICATIONS | | Subtopic: Natural gas 37 items found | |
| | Sort by: Title | Date | Results per page: |
| | A Retrospective Review of Shale Gas Development in the United States: What Led to the Boom? | | Zhongmin Wang, Alan J. Krupnick | | RFF Discussion Paper 13-12 | April 2013 | | Abstract: This is the first academic paper that reviews the economic, policy, and technology history of shale gas development in the United States. The primary objective of the paper is to answer the question of what led to the shale gas boom in the United States to help inform stakeholders in those countries that are attempting to develop their own shale gas resources. This paper is also a case study of the incentive, process, and impact of technology innovations and the role of government in promoting technology innovations in the energy industry. Our review finds that government policy, private entrepreneurship, technology innovations, private land and mineral rights ownership, high natural gas prices in the 2000s, and a number of other factors all made important contributions to the shale gas boom. | | | | Shale gas development impacts on surface water quality in Pennsylvania | | Sheila M. Olmstead, Lucija A. Muehlenbachs, Jhih-Shyang Shih, Ziyan Chu, and Alan J. Krupnick | | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences | March 2013 | Vol. 110, No. 13 | pp. 4962-4967 | | | | | | Shale Gas Development and the Costs of Groundwater Contamination Risk | | Lucija Anna Muehlenbachs, Elisheba Beia Spiller, Chris Timmins | | RFF Discussion Paper 12-40-REV | March 2013 | | Abstract: While shale gas development can result in rapid local economic development, negative externalities associated with the process may adversely affect the prices of nearby homes. We utilize a difference-in-differences estimator with additional controls for house fixed effects and the boundary of the public water service area in Washington County, Pennsylvania to identify the capitalization of groundwater contamination risk in property values, differentiating it from other externalities, lease payments to homeowners, and local economic development. We find that proximity to wells increases property values. However, groundwater contamination concerns fully offset those gains by reducing property values up to 26 percent. | | | | The Controversy over US Coal and Natural Gas Exports | | Joel Darmstadter | | Issue Brief 13-01 | March 2013 | | | | | | What the Experts Say about the Environmental Risks of Shale Gas Development | | Alan J. Krupnick, Hal Gordon, Sheila M. Olmstead | | RFF Report | February 2013 | | | | | | Managing the Risks of Shale Gas: The Latest Results from RFF's Initiative | | Kristin Hayes | | Resources | 2012 (181) | | | | | | US Energy Policy: A Changing Landscape | | Phil Sharp | | Resources | 2012 (181) | | | | | | Will Natural Gas Vehicles Be in Our Future? | | Alan J. Krupnick | | Resources | 2012 (181) | | | | | | Modeling the Electricity Sector: A Summary of Recent Analyses of New EPA Regulations | | Blair Beasley, Daniel F. Morris | | RFF Discussion Paper 12-52 | November 2012 | | Abstract: Several different economic models have been applied to try to understand how new regulations by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) could impact coal-fired generation in the United States as well as the electricity system as a whole. This paper provides an overview of many of the key studies and the models used to analyze the potential impacts of EPA’s rules. The regulations surveyed include the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR), the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS), the proposed Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 316(b) rule, and the proposed Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) rule. The models generally agree that these regulations will result in coal plant retirements, though there is far less agreement on how much generation may retire. Assumptions about the price of natural gas and the expected stringency of regulations play a key role in determining modeling results. The models provide useful guidance for policymakers when considering the potential impact of EPA regulation. | | | | The Effect of Natural Gas Supply on Retail Electricity Prices | | Karen L. Palmer, Dallas Burtraw, Matthew Woerman, Blair Beasley | | Issue Brief 12-05 | August 2012 | | | | | | Tax Reform: Impact on U.S. Energy Policy | | Phil Sharp | | U.S. Senate Committee on Finance | 6/12/12 | | | | | | The Variability of Potential Revenue from a Tax on Carbon | | Karen L. Palmer, Anthony Paul, Matthew Woerman | | Issue Brief 12-03 | May 2012 | | | | | | Secular Trends, Environmental Regulations, and Electricity Markets | | Dallas Burtraw, Karen L. Palmer, Anthony Paul, Matthew Woerman | | RFF Discussion Paper 12-15 | March 2012 | | Related journal article | | Abstract: The confluence of several pending environmental rulemakings will require billions of dollars of investment across the industry and changes in the operation of facilities. These changes may lead to retirement of some facilities, and there has been much debate about their potential effects on electricity reliability. Only very exceptional circumstances would trigger supply disruptions; however, the changes may affect electricity prices, the generation mix, and industry revenues. Coincident with these new rules, expectations about natural gas prices and future electricity demand growth are changing in ways that also will have substantial effects on the industry. This paper addresses these two sets of issues using a detailed simulation model of the U.S. electricity market. The findings suggest that recent downward adjustments in natural gas prices and electricty demand projections have a substantially larger impact on electricity prices and generation mix than do the new environmental rules. | | | | Testing for Avoidance of Environmental Obligations | | Lucija Anna Muehlenbachs | | RFF Discussion Paper 12-12 | February 2012 | | Abstract: The environmental remediation required to permanently decommissionmost industrial projects is an expensive and irreversible investment. Real options literature shows that temporarily closing a project and postponing decommissioning has value when economic conditions are uncertain and future reactivation is possible. However, high decommissioning costs create an incentive to “temporarily” close a project, even when there is no intention to reactivate. This paper estimates a dynamic discrete choice model of closure to evaluate the likelihood of reactivation. The model reveals that the option to temporarily close is being widely used to avoid environmental remediation of oil and gas wells in Canada. | | | | Natural Gas: A Bridge to a Low-Carbon Future? | | | Resources | 2012 (179) | | | | | | The Risks of Shale Gas Development: How RFF Is Identifying a Pathway toward Responsible Development | | | Resources | 2012 (179) | | | | | | Will Natural Gas Vehicles Be in Our Future? | | Alan J. Krupnick | | Issue Brief 11-06 | May 2011 | | | | | | Abundant Shale Gas Resources: Long-Term Implications for U.S. Natural Gas Markets | | Stephen P.A. Brown, Alan J. Krupnick | | RFF Discussion Paper 10-41 | August 2010 | | Abstract: According to recent assessments, the United States has considerably more recoverable natural gas in shale formations than was previously thought. Such a development raises expectations that U.S. energy consumption will shift toward natural gas. To examine how the apparent abundance of natural gas and projected growth of its use might affect natural gas prices, production, and consumption, we useNEMS-RFF to model a number of scenarios—reflecting different perspectives on natural gas availability, the availability of competing resources, demand for natural gas, and climate policy—through 2030. We find that more abundant shale gas resources create an environment in which natural gas prices are likely to remain attractive to consumers—even as policy advances additional uses of natural gas to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and bolster energy security. | | | | Abundant Natural Gas Could Mean a Paradigm Shift in U.S. Energy Markets and Policy | | Stephen P.A. Brown | | Resources | Summer 2010 (175) | | | | | | Some Implications of Tightening Regulation of U.S. Deepwater Drilling | | Stephen P.A. Brown | | Backgrounder | June 2010 | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
| FILTER PUBLICATIONS | | By Topic | | | By Type | | | By Author | | | | Display All Publications |
|
|
|
|
|