|
|
|
|
|
PROFILE |
Josh Linn’s research centers on the effect of environmental regulation and market incentives on technology, with particular focus on the electricity sector and markets for new vehicles. His work on the electricity sector has compared the effectiveness of cap and trade and alternative policy instruments in promoting new technology, including renewable electricity technologies.
Several of his studies on new vehicles markets investigate the effect of CAFE standards on new vehicle characteristics and the effect of gasoline prices on new vehicle fuel economy. Past research on the manufacturing and pharmaceuticals sectors has explored the effect on new technology of price and consumer demand incentives. He has published in leading general interest and field journals in environmental, energy, and health economics.
Linn, who joined RFF in March 2010, was an assistant professor in the economics department at the University of Illinois at Chicago and a research scientist at MIT. At MIT, he served as executive director of the MIT Study of the Future of Solar Energy.
|
|
|
|
| Featured Publications | | Renewable Electricity Policy, Intermittency, and Cost-Effectiveness | | Harrison Fell and Joshua Linn | | Journal of Environmental Economics and Management | forthcoming | Related Discussion Paper 12-54 | | | | Fuel Prices and New Vehicle Fuel Economy—Comparing the United States and Western Europe | | Thomas Klier and Joshua Linn | | Journal of Environmental Economics and Management | forthcoming | Related Discussion Paper 11-37 | | | | The Effect of Voluntary Brownfields Programs on Nearby Property Values: Evidence from Illinois | | Joshua Linn | | Journal of Urban Economics | forthcoming | Related Discussion Paper 12-35 | | | | Evaluating “Cash-for-Clunkers: Program Effects on Auto Sales and the Environment | | Shanjun Li, Joshua Linn, and Elisheba Spiller | | Journal of Environmental Economics and Management | forthcoming | Related Discussion Paper 10-39-REV | | | | New Vehicle Characteristics and the Cost of the Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standard | | Thomas Klier and Joshua Linn | | RAND Journal of Economics | forthcoming | Related Discussion Paper 10-50 | | | | Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards and the Market for New Vehicles | | Thomas Klier and Joshua Linn | | Annual Review of Resource Economics | forthcoming | Related Discussion Paper 10-68 | | | | Incentives of Carbon Dioxide Regulation for Investment in Low-Carbon Electricity Technologies in Texas | | Anya Castillo and Joshua Linn | | Energy Policy | Vol. 39, No. 3 | pp. 1831-1844 | | | | The Price of Gasoline and New Vehicle Fuel Economy: Evidence from Monthly Sales Data | | Joshua Linn and Thomas Klier | | American Economic Journal: Economic Policy | Forthcoming | | | | Who Pays for Cleaner Air? Evidence from the Nitrogen Oxides Budget Trading Program | | Joshua Linn | | Journal of Environmental Economics and Management | Vol. 59, No. 1 | pp. 1-14 | | | | The Effect of Cap-and-Trade Programs on Firms’ Profits: Evidence from the Nitrogen Oxides Budget Trading Program | | Joshua Linn | | Journal of Environmental Economics and Management | 2010 | Vol. 59, No. 1. | pp. 1-14. | | | | Energy Prices and the Adoption of Energy-Saving Technology | | Joshua Linn | | Economic Journal | Vol. 118 | pp. 1986-2012 | | | | Technological Modifications in the Nitrogen Oxides Tradable Permit Program | | Joshua Linn | | Energy Journal | Vol. 29, No. 3. | 153-176. | | | | Market Size in Innovation: Theory and Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry | | Daron Acemoglu and Joshua Linn | | Quarterly Journal of Economics | Vol. 119, No. 3. | 1049-1090. | | | | View All Related Publications |
|
|
DISCUSSION PAPERS | | Regulating Greenhouse Gases from Coal Power Plants under the Clean Air Act | | Joshua Linn, Erin Mastrangelo, Dallas Burtraw | | RFF Discussion Paper 13-05 | February 2013 | Abstract: The Clean Air Act has assumed the central role in US climate policy, directing the development of regulations governing greenhouse gas emissions from existing coal-fired power plants. This paper examines the operation of coal-fired generating units over 25 years to estimate the marginal costs and potential magnitude of emissions reductions from improving their efficiency. We find that a 10 percent increase in coal prices causes a 0.2 to 0.5 percent heat rate reduction, broadly consistent with engineering assessments. We also find that coal prices have a significant effect on utilization. The results are used to compare cost-effectiveness of alternative policies. | | | | Designing Renewable Electricity Policies to Reduce Emissions | | Harrison Fell, Joshua Linn, Clayton Munnings | | RFF Discussion Paper 12-54 | December 2012 | | Related journal article | Abstract: A variety of renewable electricity policies to promote investment in wind, solar, and other types of renewable generators exist across the United States. The federal renewable energy investment tax credit, the federal renewable energy production tax credit, and state renewable portfolio standards are among the most notable. Whether the benefits of promoting new technology and reducing pollution emissions from the power sector justify these policies’ costs has been the subject of considerable debate. We argue in this paper that the debate is misguided because it does not consider two important interactions between renewable electricity generators and the rest of the power system. First, the value of electricity from a renewable generators depends on the generation and investment it displaces. Second, a large increase in renewable generation can reduce electricity prices, increasing consumption and emissions from fossil generators, and offsetting some of the environmental benefits of the policies. Two policy conclusions follow. First, existing renewable electricity policies can be redesigned to promote investment in the highest-value generators, which can greatly reduce the cost of achieving a given emissions reduction. Second, subsidies financed out of general tax revenue reduce emissions less than subsidies financed by charges to electricity consumers. | | | | The Effect of Voluntary Brownfields Programs on Nearby Property Values: Evidence from Illinois | | Joshua Linn | | RFF Discussion Paper 12-35 | August 2012 | | Related journal article | Abstract: Brownfields are properties for which redevelopment is hampered by known or suspected contamination and by concerns about associated liability. Because failing to redevelop brownfields may negatively affect welfare and the environment, a number of states have created voluntary programs to reduce liability risks and encourage redevelopment of brownfields. For clean or remediated properties, the state certifies that owners of such sites are not subject to federal or state liability under certain conditions. Certification could increase nearby property values because of decreased contamination risk and amenities associated with redeveloping the brownfield. This paper focuses on the Site Remediation Program in Illinois, and estimates the effect of brownfields certification on nearby property values. Employing several strategies to account for unobserved and time-varying variables that may be correlated with certification, I find that certification of a brownfield 0.25 miles away raises property values by about one percent. In aggregate, the program has increased nearby property values by about two percent. | | | | Using Vehicle Taxes to Reduce Carbon Dioxide Emissions Rates of New Passenger Vehicles: Evidence from France, Germany, and Sweden | | Thomas Klier, Joshua Linn | | RFF Discussion Paper 12-34 | August 2012 | Abstract: France, Germany, and Sweden link vehicle taxes to the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions rates of passenger vehicles. Based on new vehicle registration data from 2005–2010, a vehicle’s tax is negatively correlated with its registrations. The effect is somewhat stronger in France than in Germany and Sweden. Taking advantage of the theoretical equivalence between an emissions rate standard and a CO2-based emissions rate tax, we estimate the effect on manufacturers’ profits of reducing emissions rates. For France, a decrease of 5 grams of CO2 per kilometer reduces profits by 24 euros per vehicle. We find considerable heterogeneity across manufactures and countries. | | | | Regulating Greenhouse Gases from Coal Power Plants under the Clean Air Act | | Joshua Linn, Erin Mastrangelo, Dallas Burtraw | | RFF Discussion Paper 11-43-REV | February 2012 | Abstract: The Clean Air Act has assumed the central role in U.S. climate policy, directing the Environmental Protection Agency to develop regulations governing the emissions of greenhouse gases from existing coal-fired power plants. The cost and environmental effectiveness of policy options depend on abatement costs, the magnitude of emissions reduction opportunities, and the sensitivity of plant utilization. This paper examines the operation of electricity-generating units over 25 years to estimate the marginal costs and potential magnitude of emissions reductions that could result from improvements in their operating efficiency. We find that a 10 percent increase in coal prices causes a 0.3 to 0.9 percent heat rate reduction, broadly consistent with engineering assessments of abatement costs and opportunities. We also find that coal prices have a significant effect on utilization, but that will vary depending on the policy design. The results are used to compare cost-effectiveness of alternative policies. | | | | Evaluating “Cash-for-Clunkers: Program Effects on Auto Sales and the Environment | | Shanjun Li, Joshua Linn, Elisheba Beia Spiller | | RFF Discussion Paper 10-39-REV | October 2011 | | Related journal article | Abstract: “Cash-for-Clunkers” was a $3 billion program that attempted to stimulate the U.S. economy and improve the environment by encouraging consumers to retire older vehicles and purchase more fuel-efficient new vehicles. We investigate the effects of this program on new vehicle sales and the environment. Using Canada as the control group in a difference-in-differences framework, we find that the program increased new vehicle sales by about 0.36 million during July and August of 2009, implying that approximately 45 percent of the spending went to consumers who would have purchased a new vehicle anyway. Our results suggest no gain in sales beyond 2009 and hence no meaningful stimulus to the economy. In addition, the program will reduce CO2 emissions by only 9 to 28.4 million tons, implying a cost per ton ranging from $91 to $288 even after accounting for reduced criteria pollutants. | | | | Fuel Prices and New Vehicle Fuel Economy in Europe | | Thomas Klier, Joshua Linn | | RFF Discussion Paper 11-37 | September 2011 | | Related journal article | Abstract: This paper evaluates the effect of fuel prices on new vehicle fuel economy in the eight largest European markets. The analysis spans the years 2002–2007 and uses detailed vehicle registration and specification data to control for policies, consumer preferences, and other potentially confounding factors. Fuel prices have a statistically significant effect on new vehicle fuel economy in Europe, but this estimated effect is much smaller than that for the United States. Within Europe, fuel economy responds more in the United Kingdom and France than in the other large markets. Overall, substantial changes in fuel prices would have relatively small effects on the average fuel economy of new vehicles sold in Europe. We find no evidence that diesel fuel prices have a large effect on the market share of diesel vehicles. | | | | Deepwater Drilling: Law, Policy, and Economics of Firm Organization andSafety | | Mark A Cohen, Madeline Gottlieb, Joshua Linn, Nathan Richardson | | RFF Discussion Paper 10-65 | January 2011 | | Related journal article | Abstract: Although the causes of the Deepwater Horizon spill are not yet conclusively identified, significant attention has focused on the safety-related policies and practices—often referred to as the safety culture—of BP and other firms involved in drilling the well. This paper defines and characterizes the economic and policy forces that affect safety culture and identifies reasons why those forces may ormay not be adequate or effective from the public’s perspective. Two potential justifications for policy intervention are that: a) not all of the social costs of a spill may be internalized by a firm; and b) there may be principal-agency problems within the firm, which could be reduced by external monitoring. The paper discusses five policies that could increase safety culture and monitoring: liability, financialresponsibility (a requirement that a firm’s assets exceed a threshold), government oversight, mandatory private insurance, and risk-based drilling fees. We find that although each policy has a positive effect on safety culture, there are important differences and interactions that must be considered. In particular, the latter three provide external monitoring. Furthermore, raising liability caps without mandating insurance or raising financial responsibility requirements could have a small effect on the safety culture of smallfirms that would declare bankruptcy in the event of a large spill. The paper concludes with policy recommendations for promoting stronger safety culture in offshore drilling; our preferred approach wouldbe to set a liability cap for each well equal to the worst-case social costs of a spill, and to requireinsurance up to the cap. | | | | The Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards and the Market for New Vehicles | | Thomas Klier, Joshua Linn | | RFF Discussion Paper 10-68 | December 2010 | | Related journal article | Abstract: This paper presents an overview of the economics literature on the effect of Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards on the new vehicle market. Since 1978, CAFE has imposed fuel economy standards for cars and light trucks sold in the U.S. market. This paper reviews the history of the standards, followed by a discussion of the major upcoming changes in implementation and stringency. It describes strategies that firms can use to meet the standards and reviews the CAFE literature as it applies to the new vehicle market. The paper concludes by highlighting areas for future research in light of the upcoming changes to CAFE. | | | | New Vehicle Characteristics and the Cost of the Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standard | | Thomas Klier, Joshua Linn | | RFF Discussion Paper 10-50 | December 2010 | | Related journal article | Abstract: By 2016, the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standard will increase by 40 percent from its current level, representing the first major increase in the standard since its creation in 1975. Previous analysis of the CAFE standard has focused on its short-run effects (1–2 years), in which vehicle characteristics are held fixed, or its long run effects (10 years or more), when firms can adopt new power train technology. This paper focuses on the medium run, when firms can choose characteristics such as weight and power, yet have only limited ability to modify current technology. We first document the historical importance of the medium run and then estimate consumers’ willingness to pay for vehicle characteristics. We employ a novel empirical strategy that accounts for the vehicle characteristics’ endogeneity by using variation in the set of engine models used in vehicle models. The results imply that consumers value an increase in power more than a proportional increase in fuel economy. Simulations of the medium-run effects of an increase in the CAFE standard suggest that regulatory costs are significantly smaller in the medium run than in the short run. | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| RELATED SUBTOPICS | | Alternative Fuels and Vehicles, CAFE Standards, Coal, Electricity Markets and Regulation, Europe, Fuel Taxes, Markets, Natural Gas, Regulation, Renewable and Clean Energy, State and U.S. Regional Policies, Vehicle Pollution |
|
|
|
|
|
|