|
|
|
|
|
PROFILE | Anthony Liu’s research focuses on two broad areas: climate change policy and the environment in developing countries. Some of his current work addresses carbon taxes and the unique properties that could make them attractive components of modern tax systems. Using a combination of analytical models and general equilibrium simulations, Liu has found that the cost of carbon taxes could be much lower than has been previously believed. Liu is also interested in pollution issues and the interactions between the environment and the economy in China, and has studied large-scale water treatment infrastructure in China.
|
|
|
|
| Featured Publications | | Inside RFF | | Jintao Xu, Karen L. Palmer, Sheila M. Olmstead, Richard D. Morgenstern, Allen Blackman, Juha V. Siikamäki, Timothy J. Brennan, P. Lynn Scarlett, James N. Sanchirico, Yusuke Kuwayama , Antung Anthony Liu, C. Boyden Gray | | Resources | 2013 (182) | | | | Fiscal Incentives and Environmental Infrastructure in China | | Antung Anthony Liu, Junjie Zhang | | RFF Discussion Paper 12-36 | September 2012 | | | | Tax Evasion and Optimal Environmental Taxes | | Antung Anthony Liu | | RFF Discussion Paper 12-37 | September 2012 | | | | View All Related Publications |
|
|
DISCUSSION PAPERS | | Fiscal Incentives and Environmental Infrastructure in China | | Antung Anthony Liu, Junjie Zhang | | RFF Discussion Paper 12-36 | September 2012 | Abstract: This paper provides evidence that China's system of tax revenue sharing is an important explanation for differences in the rate of sewage treatment plant construction among its cities. As a result of the 1994 tax reform, Chinese cities retained different shares of their value-added tax (VAT). Exploiting the persistence of this sharing system, we use the VAT share in 1995 as an instrument for the present fiscal incentives. We find that a 10 percentage point increase in the VAT sharing rate resulted in a 13.8% increase in the construction of sewage treatment capacity. This result suggests that fiscal incentives can play an important role in the provision of pollution-reducing infrastructure. | | | | Tax Evasion and Optimal Environmental Taxes | | Antung Anthony Liu | | RFF Discussion Paper 12-37 | September 2012 | Abstract: This paper introduces a new argument to the debate about the role of environmental taxes in modern tax systems. Some environmental taxes, particularly taxes on gasoline or electricity, are more dicult to evade than taxes on labor or income. When the tax base is shifted in a revenue-neutral manner toward these environmental taxes, the result is a net reduction in the amount of tax evasion. Using a carbon tax as a motivating example, the "tax evasion effect" is shown to sharply reduce the welfare cost of controlling emissions. A simple computable general equilibrium model suggests that the impact of considering tax evasion can be large: costs are lowered by 28% in the United States, by 89% in China, and by 97% in India. In countries with high levels of pre-existing tax evasion, a carbon tax will pay for itself through improvements in the efficiency of the tax system. | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|