CCEP > Projects > Regulating Carbon under the Clean Air Act: A Focus on the Electric Power Sector
Regulating Carbon under the Clean Air Act:
A Focus on the Electric Power Sector
The modern Clean Air Act, originally passed in 1970, has proven durable and flexible. Since 2007, the act has been used to regulate greenhouse gases that cause climate change, including standards for mobile emissions sources and pre-construction permitting of stationary sources.
The US Environmental Protection Agency is issuing performance standards for new and existing sources in the electric power sector. Accordingly, the Clean Air Act has become the central vehicle for climate policy at the national level.
RFF researchers are analyzing the effectiveness, efficiency, and distributional impacts of options for regulating carbon emissions under the Clean Air Act. Below are examples of recent work.
Frequently Asked Questions
- The Costs and Consequences of Clean Air Act Regulation of CO2 from Power Plants.
RFF’s Dallas Burtraw, Joshua Linn, Karen L. Palmer, and Anthony Paul compare policy options for regulating carbon dioxide from power plants under the Clean Air Act. Flexible approaches would create credits or permits that could be distributed to electricity producers, consumers, or the government—and each option impacts electricity prices and social costs differently.
- Technology Flexibility and Stringency for Greenhouse Gas Regulations.
Under the Clean Air Act, tradable performance standards emerge as the likely tool to achieve flexibility in the regulation of existing stationary sources. In this discussion paper, RFF’s Dallas Burtraw and Matthew Woerman examine the relationship between flexibility and stringency.
- Comparing the Clean Air Act and a Carbon Price. Over the past half-decade, a variety of federal legislative proposals for limiting greenhouse gas emissions have been put forward, most of which would set a price on carbon and would have preempted authority to regulate those emissions under the Clean Air Act. In this discussion paper, RFF’s Nathan Richardson and Arthur Fraas assess both policies and, in particular, the features that are important to a comparative evaluation.
- Playing Without Aces: Offsets and the Limits of Flexibility under Clean Air Act Climate Policy. In this discussion paper, RFF’s Nathan Richardson analyzes different regulatory options under the Clean Air Act, including trading among different sources, biomass co-firing, and offsets. While trading among emitters appears generally compatible with the law, legal limitations and practical problems make more ambitious trading schemes that could reduce costs difficult or impossible to adopt. This research was also published in Environmental Law.
See more research on the Clean Air Act.
Recent Posts on RFF’s Blog, Common Resources
- June 23, 2014: Quick Thoughts on UARG v. EPA
- June 23, 2014: Energy Efficiency in 111(d): Evaluating Energy Savings for Carbon Reduction
- June 19, 2014: Energy Efficiency in 111(d): The Role of End-Use Efficiency in State Compliance Plans
- June 16, 2014: Energy Efficiency in 111(d): Understanding Building Block #4
- June 11, 2014: Twitter Q&A Roundup: EPA’s Clean Air Plan
- June 11, 2014: EPA’s Proposal vs. a Carbon Price – Initial Thoughts
- June 10, 2014: What’s In the BSER: EPA’s Process for Setting State Goals in the Clean Power Plan
- June 4, 2014: EPA’s Carbon Proposal – Which States Have The Biggest Burden Isn’t Simple
- June 4, 2014: 2005 vs. 2012 in EPA’s Proposal
- June 4, 2014: Comparing the Clean Air Act and a Carbon Price
See more blog posts on the Clean Air Act.