Transit in Washington, DC: Current Benefits and Optimal Level of Provision

Download

Date

April 10, 2006

Authors

Per-Kristian Nelson, Andrew Baglino, Winston Harrington, Elena Safirova, and D. Lipman

Publication

Working Paper

Reading time

1 minute
The discrepancy between transit’s large share of local transportation resources and its generally low share of local trips has raised questions about the use of scarce transportation funds for this purpose. We use a regional transport model consistent with utility theory and calibrated for the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area to estimate the travel benefits of the local transit system to transit users and the congestion-reduction benefits to motorists. We find that (i) rail transit generates congestion-reduction benefits that exceed rail subsidies; (ii) the combined benefits of rail and bus transit easily exceed local transit subsidies generally; (iii) the lowest-income group receives a disproportionately low share of the transit benefits, both in absolute terms and as a share of total income; and (iv) for practical purposes, the scale of the current transit system is about optimal.

Authors

Per-Kristian Nelson

Andrew Baglino

Elena Safirova

D. Lipman

Related Content