Research Overview  
 Knowledge Areas &
 Research Topics
 
 Energy,
 Electricity,and
 Climate Change
 
 Environment and
 Development
 
 Environmental
 Management
 
 Food and
 Agriculture
 
 Fundamental
 Research Studies
 
 Natural and
 Biological
 Resources
 
 Technology and the
 Environment
 
 Public Health  
 Urban Complexities  
 RFF and the News
 Media
 
 News Releases  
 Features  
 Media Coverage  
 RFF Weekly Policy
 Commentary
 
 Join/Donate  
 President's Circle  
 RFF Council  
 RFF Gift Fund  
 Legacy Society  
 Endowing Research  
 Sources of Support  
 RFF Today  
 Board of Directors  
 Directory of
 Scholars
 
 Staff  
 University Fellows  
 Public Service  
 Employment
 Opportunities
 
 Fellowships and
 Internships
 
 GSA Schedule /
 MOBIS
 
 Getting to RFF  
 New Publications
 from RFF
 
 Discussion Papers  
 RFF Reports  
 Issue Briefs  
 RFF Press (Books)  
 Resources  
 Reference Materials  
 Testimony  
 Events at RFF  
 Calendar of Events  
 First Wednesday
 Seminars
 
 Conferences and
 Workshops
 
 RFF Policy
 Leadership Forum
 
 Academic Seminar
 Series
 
Quick Links:
 
RFF HomeSite MapContact Us


RFF Links
February 2004 News Coverage

June 2004 News Coverage

Date

News Source

Headline

Summary

6/26/04 National Journal

Energy – King Coal’s Resurgence & Coal: Not a Four-Letter Word

With electricity consumption growing dramatically and the price of natural gas tripling in the last 3 years, coal is returning as the cheapest answer for energy. This article reviews U.S. power sources and discusses modern environmental regulations that increase the cost of coal production. Included is an excerpt from Jim Roger’s (CEO of Cincinnati-based Cinergy) RFF-hosted speech on his plans to build the nation’s most expensive and most environmentally friendly coal planet.
6/25/04 Inside EPA Graham Highlights EPA Problems in Assessing Benefits of Air Rules This article goes over the issues discussed at an RFF hosted event promoting the newly released Choosing Environmental Policy: Comparing Instruments and Outcomes in the U.S. and Europe. Guest panelists John Graham of the OMB, suggests the EPA analysis of the benefits of Air rules does not take into account the scientific uncertainty in cost-benefit reviews.
6/25/04

Electric Energy Online (Montreal, QC)

Also ran in:

Power Marketing Association-Power Report

Mercury Debate Concentrates on Hot Spots Senior Fellows Dallas Burtraw and Alan Krupnick are quoted on their findings regarding the cap-and-trade component of the Bush administrations proposal on mercury levels. They say the cap could be set lower to produce quicker and improved results.
6/24/04 CNNMoney An Assessment of the Impacts of Forest Management on Aboriginal Hunters: Evidence from Stated and Revealed Preference Data This article cites RFF Gilbert White Visiting Fellow W. Adamowicz.
6/22/04

CNNMoney

Also ran in:

Rural Sociology

Resource Dependence and Community Well-Being in Rural Canada The RFF document, ‘Natural Resources and Rural Poverty: An Overview’ is referenced.
6/18/04 Inside Washington Publishers OMB Official Highlights EPA Problems In Assessing Benefits of Air Rules White House Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) regulatory chief John Graham joins a roundtable on environmental policy hosted by RFF.
6/16/04 Roll Call Climbers Former RFF research assistant, Aaron Severn, recently joined Senator Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) as a legislative assistant.
6/13/04 The State.com (SC) South Carolina has Scant Funding Options

South Carolina is looking for money form the Federal Superfund program for major cleanup of pollutants. RFF Senior Fellow Kate Probst states that the South Carolina Pinewood landfill may be listed under Superfund sites in the future, but is not guaranteed money because of this listing.

6/13/04 The Hartford Courant We Need To Pay Even More At The Pump The author discusses the benefits of gas taxes which include reducing the number of cars on the road and requiring the production and purchase of more efficient vehicles. Senior Fellow Ian Parry agrees that there is a compelling case for higher gasoline taxes and that, “people are undercharged for driving.”
6/11/04 Science Wounding Earth’s Fragile Skin Pierre Crosson, recently retired from RFF, challenges the calculations of the cost of soil erosion in the United States determined by Cornell University ecologist David Pimentel. Crosson points out that Pimentel’s figures are based largely on models rather than field data.
6/04/04 Edina Sun-Current (MN) More than one side to an issue Howard Gruensphecht of RFF is quoted as saying Environmentalists are putting too much weight in the Clean Air Act’s New Source Review program. Instead, Gruensphrecht believes that the NSR should be replaced w/ more effective & efficient policies as it retards environmental progress and wastes resources.
6/1/04

Environment

Also ran in:

CNNMoney

Controlling Sulfur Dioxide in China: Will Emission Trading Work? The article notes that in 2001 RFF lent technical assistance to the city of Taiyuan in northern China’s Shanxi province in establishing an efficient cap-and-trade program.
6/1/2004 Journal of the American Water Resources Association Nutrient Mass Balance and Trends, Mobile River Basin, Alabama, Georgia, and Mississippi An Overview of the RFF Environmental Data Inventory: Methods, Sources, and Preliminary Results was cited in this lengthy piece on a study of nutrient levels in some southeastern U.S. water sources.
6/01/2004 Journal of Economic Issues Industrial Activity The author is comparing neoclassical environmental economic views of environmental regulation with non-neoclassical views using the example of RFF’s Karen Palmer, Paul Portney, and Wallace Oates response to the arguments set forth by Michael Porter and Claus van der Linde.
6/2004 Risk Policy Report Amid Findings of Unreliable Claims: OMB Peer-Review Guide May Get Boost From Health Warning Study A review of Syracuse University Professor Allan Mazur’s study on government issued public health warnings that include risks posed by environmental contaminants. The study finds that federal issued warnings are often less reliable than warnings developed and peer-reviewed by scientific organizations.

<< Previous | New >>