Research Overview  
 Knowledge Areas &
 Research Topics
 
 Energy,
 Electricity,and
 Climate Change
 
 Environment and
 Development
 
 Environmental
 Management
 
 Food and
 Agriculture
 
 Fundamental
 Research Studies
 
 Natural and
 Biological
 Resources
 
 Technology and the
 Environment
 
 Public Health  
 Urban Complexities  
 RFF and the News
 Media
 
 News Releases  
 Features  
 Media Coverage  
 RFF Weekly Policy
 Commentary
 
 Join/Donate  
 President's Circle  
 RFF Council  
 RFF Gift Fund  
 Legacy Society  
 Endowing Research  
 Sources of Support  
 RFF Today  
 Board of Directors  
 Directory of
 Scholars
 
 Staff  
 University Fellows  
 Public Service  
 Employment
 Opportunities
 
 Fellowships and
 Internships
 
 GSA Schedule /
 MOBIS
 
 Getting to RFF  
 New Publications
 from RFF
 
 Discussion Papers  
 RFF Reports  
 Issue Briefs  
 RFF Press (Books)  
 Resources  
 Reference Materials  
 Testimony  
 Events at RFF  
 Calendar of Events  
 First Wednesday
 Seminars
 
 Conferences and
 Workshops
 
 RFF Policy
 Leadership Forum
 
 Academic Seminar
 Series
 
Quick Links:
 
RFF HomeSite MapContact Us


RFF Links
RFF Feature

CAFE Reforms Could Address
Long-Term Oil Consumption
RFF Scholars Testify Before House, Senate

As oil prices climb and the public looks for relief at the pump, Resources for the Future President Phil Sharp and Senior Fellow Billy Pizer were called before the House Energy and Commerce Committee to testify on how Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards might affect the issue. The following week, Sharp appeared before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation's Subcommittee on Surface Transportation and Merchant Marine to discuss the same subject. (Video of the full House hearing appears below; Phil Sharp and Billy Pizer's remarks appear in Panel Three.)

Sharp was careful to note that, while reforming CAFE standards could have many benefits, reducing gasoline prices is not among them.

"Action now by Congress on fuel economy standards obviously will have no immediate impact on gasoline prices. Indeed, it will take some years for changes in the policy to have any impact at all," he noted. "But action now on fuel economy standards can help the United States address important concerns over the longer term."

Pizer outlined for the Committee opportunities to reform CAFE standards for passenger cars in light of recent reforms to the light truck standards.

"The light-truck rule provides a model for two improvements: differentiating manufacturers' standards based on their mix of large and small vehicles, and setting the overall level of the standards based on an explicit and careful cost-benefit analysis," he said.

"Further reforms include trading between the passenger car and light-truck fleets, trading among manufacturers, unrestricted banking of CAFE credits earned by exceeding the standard, and a cost-limiting safety valve."

The hearings came as the National Highway Transportation and Safety Administration (NHTSA) called on Congress to grant it the authority to make changes to standards for passenger vehicles. Pizer and Sharp both remarked that delegating target setting and redesign to NHTSA made sense.

 

Link to Congressional Testimony
Testimony on CAFE Program Reforms
Philip R Sharp
United States House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce
May 3, 2006
Summary

Link to Congressional Testimony
Testimony on CAFE Program Reforms
William A. Pizer
United States House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce
May 3, 2006
Summary

"I find the complexity of the standard-setting process, as well as the need to regularly revisit the level of the standard, to be more suitable for agency rulemaking than Congressional action," Pizer stated. "Congress can instead reform the structure of CAFE to increase efficiency, continue to give NHTSA clear guidance on the key costs and benefits it should consider, and perhaps require greater transparency with regard to the cost modeling."

 

Sharp also noted that policymakers might want to look beyond CAFE for ways to reduce fuel consumption.

 

"Many experts believe that a more effective approach to reducing fuel consumption -- and a more cost-effective approach for the U.S. economy -- would be a stronger gasoline or oil tax, either as an alternative to CAFE or in conjunction with it," he said. "The impact would not only encourage consumers to purchase more efficient vehicles, but it would also encourage them to be more economical in their driving, a critical component that CAFE does nothing to address. Indeed, such a tax would have a more rapid impact on consumption than is possible through CAFE alone."




To view the videos, you need RealPlayer. Get a free RealPlayer at www.real.com.

Opening Statements

Joe Barton - Texas Link to Video

Chairman,
House Energy and Commerce Committee

Link to video

Anna G. Eshoo - California | Link to Video

Member,
House Energy and Commerce Committee

Link to video


Michael Bilirakis - Florida | Link to Video

Vice Chairman,
House Energy and Commerce Committee

Link to video

John D. Dingell - Michigan | Link to Video

Ranking Member,
House Energy and Commerce Committee

Link to video

 Mike Ferguson - New Jersey | Link to Video

Member,
House Energy and Commerce Committee

Link to video

Henry A. Waxman - California | Link to Video

Member,
House Energy and Commerce Committee

Link to video

 Tim Murphy - California | Link to Video

Member,
House Energy and Commerce Committee

Link to video

Edward J. Markey - Massachusetts | Link to Video

Member,
House Energy and Commerce Committee

Link to video

 Lois Capps - California | Link to Video

Member,
House Energy and Commerce Committee

Link to video


John Shimkus - Illinois | Link to Video

Member,
House Energy and Commerce Committee

Link to video

 Tom Allen - Maine | Link to Video

Member,
House Energy and Commerce Committee

Link to video

Mike Rogers - Michigan | Link to Video

Member,
House Energy and Commerce Committee