Waxman-Markey and the Important Price Collar 

Tags: Cap and Trade, Congress, United States, Safety Valve, Price Collar, Waxman-Markey

 
While much attention in the discussion of the new draft of the Waxman-Markey energy bill (H.R. 2454) will be devoted to the gratis allowance allocations, don’t overlook the economic importance of a new provision establishing a floor on the price of allowances (Sec. 791(d)). 
 
“(d) RESERVE AUCTION PRICE.—The minimum reserve auction price shall be $10 for auctions occurring in 2012. The minimum reserve price for auctions occurring in years after 2012 shall be the minimum reserve auction price for the previous year increased by 5 percent plus the rate of inflation (as measured by the Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers).”
 
Short-run demand and supply conditions can lead to significant allowance price volatility, as we have seen in the European Union’s carbon market.  Very low allowance prices may not provide the needed incentives for conservation, and the development and deployment of new technology. H.R. 2454 adopts and minimum price auction ($10 reserve price in 2012) to set an allowance price floor.  To the extent the Strategic Reserve Auction can act as a credible price ceiling, the bill now contains a price “collar,” the combination of a floor and ceiling designed to minimize allowance price volatility. 
 
RFF researchers Dallas Burtraw and Karen Palmer (in this paper), and Harrison Fell and Richard Morgenstern (in this paper) have been developing the price collar for the past 24 months.  Recent work by these scholars reveals the considerable economic advantages attaching to a collar over a standard cap & trade program or a program with only ceiling price (often known as a safety valve).
 
Raymond J. Kopp is a senior fellow and director of Resources for the Future’s Climate Policy Program.

 
Views expressed above are those of the author. Resources for the Future does not take institutional positions on legislative or policy questions. All information contained on Weathervane is intended for informational and educational purposes and may only be used for these purposes. Please see RFF's Terms of Use for further information.

2 Comments | Bookmark this post with:        
 

Comments


Len Griffiths commented on Thursday, 21-May-2009
This Bill was eviscerated in congress. As far as affecting climate forcing in any meaninglful manneer it is not worth the paper it is written upon. An enormous wasted opportunity. If, as seems to be the case, we must go with cap&trade, all allowances need to be autioned with a "reserve-price" floor, the initial emission caps set below current emission levels. LenG


Dallas Burtraw commented on Tuesday, 2-Jun-2009
Whether Len is right or not will become evident in the near future. The surprising twist is that a safety valve once criticized as a "ceiling" that converts the cap and trade allowance price into a tax, now appears more likely as a floor. With expansive use of offsets, EPA suggests the allowance price may be $13, not much above the reserve price of $10.

Name:
URL:
Email:
Comments:


2010 Oil Spill Adaptation Atlas