What Electricity Sector Allocations Could Mean for Households 

Tags: Cap and Trade, United States, Allocations, Waxman-Markey

 
Average Projected Consumer Costs After Rebate Under $21/ton CO2 Tax, by RegionThe introduction of a cap-and-trade program for carbon dioxide emissions could have important effects on households. Changes in the electricity sector are especially important because nearly 40 percent of emissions come from this sector and a majority of emissions reductions are expected to come from this sector in the early decades of a program.
Average Projected Consumer Costs with $21/ton CO2 Tax by RegionBut the changes in the electricity sector may affect households in different regions and income groups in different ways, as electricity is derived from different sources and transmitted by distinct means. To reduce possible adverse effects on electricity prices, various proposals call for free allocation of emissions allowances to local electricity distribution companies.
 
Average Projected Consumer Costs with $21/ton CO2 Tax after Auction, by DecileThese companies are regulated throughout the nation and could be expected to act as trustees on behalf of consumers, using allowance value to offset the lion’s share of the increase in electricity prices that would otherwise occur under a cap-and-trade program. Free allocation to electricity consumers will mitigate the change in electricity bills; however the ultimate effect on households is uncertain.
 
Average Projected Consumer Costs with $21/ton CO2 Tax by Income DecileThe lower electricity prices that result lead to increased electricity consumption and associated emissions in the electricity sector. Achieving the same level of emissions reduction from the overall economy would require greater emission reductions in other sectors such as personal transportation, industry, etc. In turn, this raises the costs of goods and services from these sectors. Second, the allocation of free allowances to electricity consumption erodes the allowance value that otherwise might be returned to households or firms or directed to other purposes.
 
We model the household impacts of an allowance auction and free allocation in this technical paper, considering the differing impacts through the nation’s various regions. We found that with the exceptions of the Ohio Valley region and households with the highest income deciles, consumers would see smaller cost increases with an auctioning system than they would if allocations were given gratis to local electricity distributors ($139 annually per household with an auction as opposed to $175 a year with allowances).

A table of our results can be found here.
 
Rich Sweeney is a research assistant at Resources for the Future and regular contributor to Common Tragedies.
 
Dallas Burtraw is a senior fellow. His research interests include the design of environmental regulation, the costs and benefits of environmental regulation, and the regulation and restructuring of the electricity industry.

 
Views expressed above are those of the author. Resources for the Future does not take institutional positions on legislative or policy questions. All information contained on Weathervane is intended for informational and educational purposes and may only be used for these purposes. Please see RFF's Terms of Use for further information.

0 Comments | Bookmark this post with:        
 

Comments

Name:
URL:
Email:
Comments:


2010 Oil Spill Adaptation Atlas