Publications
Glossary
About Weathervane
Home
What Electricity Sector Allocations Could Mean for Households
Tags:
Cap and Trade
,
United States
,
Allocations
,
Waxman-Markey
By Rich Sweeney and Dallas Burtraw
Posted: 05/22/09
The introduction of a cap-and-trade program for carbon dioxide emissions could have important effects on households. Changes in the electricity sector are especially important because nearly 40 percent of emissions come from this sector and a majority of emissions reductions are expected to come from this sector in the early decades of a program.
But the changes in the electricity sector may affect households in different regions and income groups in different ways, as electricity is derived from different sources and transmitted by distinct means. To reduce possible adverse effects on electricity prices, various proposals call for free allocation of emissions allowances to local electricity distribution companies.
These companies are regulated throughout the nation and could be expected to act as trustees on behalf of consumers, using allowance value to offset the lion’s share of the increase in electricity prices that would otherwise occur under a cap-and-trade program. Free allocation to electricity consumers will mitigate the change in electricity bills; however the ultimate effect on households is uncertain.
The lower electricity prices that result lead to increased electricity consumption and associated emissions in the electricity sector. Achieving the same level of emissions reduction from the overall economy would require greater emission reductions in other sectors such as personal transportation, industry, etc. In turn, this raises the costs of goods and services from these sectors. Second, the allocation of free allowances to electricity consumption erodes the allowance value that otherwise might be returned to households or firms or directed to other purposes.
We model the household impacts of an allowance auction and free allocation in
this technical paper
, considering the differing impacts through the nation’s various regions. We found that with the exceptions of the Ohio Valley region and households with the highest income deciles, consumers would see smaller cost increases with an auctioning system than they would if allocations were given gratis to local electricity distributors ($139 annually per household with an auction as opposed to $175 a year with allowances).
A table of our results can be found
here
.
Rich Sweeney is a research assistant at Resources for the Future and regular contributor to
Common Tragedies
.
Dallas Burtraw
is a senior fellow. His research interests include the design of environmental regulation, the costs and benefits of environmental regulation, and the regulation and restructuring of the electricity industry.
Views expressed above are those of the author. Resources for the Future does not take institutional positions on legislative or policy questions. All information contained on Weathervane is intended for informational and educational purposes and may only be used for these purposes. Please see RFF's
Terms of Use
for further information.
0 Comments | Bookmark this post with:
Comments
Name:
URL:
Email:
Comments:
Tuesday’s Reads: Letter Grades
Monday’s Reads: Nearing Approval
The President’s Task Force on CCS: It’s Going To Be Pretty Expensive
Wednesday’s Reads: Light Impact
Thursday’s Reads: Moving Beyond Fossil Fuels
Status Report on Biofuels: Progress, but It’s Getting Harder
Tuesday’s Reads: New Review
Monday’s Reads: Open For Business
Friday's Reads: The Key Barrier
Thursday's Reads: Climate at the Polls
Adaptation
,
Allocations
,
Biofuels
,
Border Adjustments
,
CAFE
,
Cap and Dividend
,
Cap and Trade
,
Carbon Market
,
Cash for Clunkers
,
CCS
,
China
,
Clean Air Act
,
Climate Change
,
Climate Exchange
,
Climate Science
,
CO2
,
Coal
,
Competitiveness
,
Congress
,
COP-15
,
Corporate
,
Cost
,
Disclosure
,
Discounting
,
Economics
,
Ecosystem Services
,
Energy Security
,
Environmental Justice
,
EPA
,
Externalities
,
Financing
,
Forest Carbon
,
Forests
,
Fuel Efficiency
,
FutureGen
,
Geoengineering
,
Green Jobs
,
In Case You Missed It
,
International
,
Kerry-Boxer
,
Leakage
,
Lifecycle Costing
,
Mitigation
,
Morning Reads
,
Natural Gas
,
Nuclear
,
Obama Administration
,
Oceans
,
Offsets
,
Oil
,
Price Collar
,
REDD
,
Renewables
,
RGGI
,
Risk
,
Safety Valve
,
SEC
,
Subsidies
,
Testimony
,
United States
,
Voluntary Programs
,
Water
,
Waxman-Markey
,
An Economic View of the Environment
The Climate Post
Common Tragedies
DotEarth
Environmental and Urban Economics
Environmental Economics
Green Inc./NYT
The National Journal's Expert Blog: Energy and Environment
Yale Environment 360
March 2009 (1)
April 2009 (10)
May 2009 (12)
June 2009 (16)
July 2009 (20)
August 2009 (33)
September 2009 (36)
October 2009 (40)
November 2009 (31)
December 2009 (54)
January 2010 (33)
February 2010 (36)
March 2010 (44)
April 2010 (14)
May 2010 (28)
June 2010 (28)
July 2010 (20)
August 2010 (20)