Sep04

Friday's Reads

Coal, COP-15, Congress, Climate Science, Morning Reads

 

Image courtest Bob Hallenin AP: According to recently-published research the past ten years have been the warmest the Arctic has seen in 2,000 years. The temperature increase has led to changing sea ice, melting glaciers, and thawing permafrost.

 

Reuters: Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) says President Obama’s trip to China in November will give the U.S. a great opportunity to sign a bilateral agreement on climate change.

 

NYT: New study suggests measuring the intensity of electric light from satellite photos could help economists track prosperity. After crunching the numbers they say light use correlates to a nation’s GDP.

 

NYT: A profile of “skeptical environmentalist” Bjorn Lomborg. He says technology—in the form of geoengineering—is the best solution to the world’s climate problem.

 

Foreign Affairs: Essay suggests taking a cue from U.N. officials and lowering Copenhagen expectations, looking at the conference as an opportunity to create robust national policies and set targeted cuts around the globe.

 

And Harvard’s Rob Stavins on the future of U.S. coal.

 

Did we miss something today? Let us know, leave a comment or e-mail clements@rff.org.

Published: Sep-04-09 | 0 Comments

Jun16

Obama Administration Puts FutureGen Back in Play

Obama Administration, CCS, Coal, FutureGen

Not surprisingly, the Obama administration has revived the planning process for FutureGen, a demonstration project to generate electricity with coal but without carbon emissions into the atmosphere.
 
Energy Secretary Steven Chu announced late last week a restart of work on engineering design and on a funding plan. He said that he foresees a final decision early next year on whether to proceed with construction. FutureGen is a partnership between the federal government and a consortium of large American and foreign utilities and mining companies, including a Chinese utility. The program was initiated by the Bush administration, which suddenly stopped it early last year on grounds that the cost estimates were excessive.
 
But it’s not surprising that the present administration has returned to it, for FutureGen represents a solution—and so far the only visible solution—to an urgent dilemma of energy and environmental policy. The United States, like the world generally, relies on coal to generate nearly half of its electricity. But burning coal emits massive amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, and carbon dioxide contributes to global warming.
 
FutureGen would construct a coal-burning generating plant in Mattoon, Illinois, to demonstrate the technology, known as carbon capture and sequestration (CCS), to capture the carbon dioxide and seal it permanently underground. The concept is clear in theory but it has never been tried on an industrial scale, and no private company wants to bear the risk of experimenting. Under FutureGen, the government would provide $1 billion already appropriated by Congress in the economic recovery legislation, and the consortium has pledged an additional $400 million.
 
The idea of developing and demonstrating technology to sequester carbon is widely popular in Congress, where many members acknowledge the need to reduce carbon dioxide emissions but see no way to meet the country’s demand for electricity without coal. The Waxman-Markey bill to slow climate change would set up a permanent Carbon Storage Research Corporation, funded by a charge on burning fossil fuels.
 
John Anderson is Resources for the Future’s journalist in residence. He previously explored FutureGen in this 2008 Weekly Policy Commentary.
Published: Jun-16-09 | 0 Comments


Adaptation Atlas