Mar26

EPA Calls for Corporate Identifiers on GHG Disclosure

Disclosure, Corporate, EPA

 

Earlier this week, the EPA proposed expanding its greenhouse gas (GHG) observation net by adding additional emissions sources to its mandatory GHG reporting system. If the proposal is enacted the system, which required some 31 industrial sectors to begin tracking and reporting their GHG output earlier this year, would expand to cover oil and natural gas sectors.

 

The rule also proposes folding an additional layer of reporting into the mix, requiring facilities to disclose their corporate ownership. As environmental concerns become increasingly important in investment decisions, having a clear picture of who is emitting and where will help investors, corporations and government devise smarter plans and policies going forward.

 

As Mark Cohen pointed out in this July 2009 post, the EPA already includes corporate identifiers in many of its monitoring programs and the measure could be of great use to investors and observers:

 

Corporate identifiers are important because facility environmental performance varies by the location, size, and financial standing of the parent company. Investors and NGOs are also increasingly interested in corporate-level climate policies and impacts. For example, the Carbon Disclosure Project, Global Reporting Initiative, and budding carbon footprint labeling efforts (See post A Call for Product Carbon Labeling) are dependent upon accurate data to verify corporate sustainability performance.

 

The EPA currently requires corporate parent identifiers in other reporting programs, such as the Risk Management Plan Rule. This small burden on reporters could reduce redundancy and errors that could lead to contradictory conclusions.

 

Tiffany Clements is managing editor of Weathervane.

Published: Mar-26-10 | 0 Comments

Dec18

New Research Tackles Climate Change Governance Impasse

International, Voluntary Programs, Corporate

 

Juice Box image courtesy thingermajig via Flickr This week’s U.N. climate talks highlight the gulf between developed and developing nations. Responsibility for emissions reductions, monitoring, and enforcement are the tragedy of the climate change commons. Despite commitments set, or delayed, in Copenhagen, new research from RFF Vice President and Senior Fellow Mark Cohen and Vanderbilt University Law Professor Michael Vandenbergh suggests that corporate reporting of carbon emissions and carbon product labeling could be crucial tools to help solve the governance dilemma.

 

Major developing countries such as China and India are projected to account for 80 percent of global emissions growth in the next several decades. Meanwhile, carbon-intensive production continues to shift to labor abundant developing nations, creating what economists call leakage. In a forthcoming article published by New York University’s Environmental Law Journal, Climate Change Governance: Boundaries and Leakage, Cohen and Vandenbergh propose corporate carbon footprint disclosure and carbon product labeling as a means to incentivize emissions reductions among suppliers even in the absence of government regulations.

 

“Information disclosure has been called the third wave of environmental regulation,” Cohen said. “There are numerous examples around the world where either facility-level disclosure or product labeling has resulted in significant reductions in pollution without direct regulation.” Vandenbergh states that “there is a growing sense that we need to be creating private incentives for carbon emissions reduction while public measures are developed.”

 

Climate governance proposals are a sour point for international negotiations, especially for emerging economies like China. Cohen and Vandenbergh advise a multi-pronged approach where governments and non-governmental organizations expand upon existing reporting boundaries and product disclosure schemes which tally the total carbon emissions for producing a specific good. The model creates informal social pressures for firms, and consumers who buy their products, to reduce emissions from domestic and global supply chains.

 

Atmospheric carbon targets will not be achieved without the active participation of China and other major developing countries. Market pressures from information disclosure provide an avenue to achieve reductions without exacerbating the political rift between nations.

 

Aysha Ghadiali is a Research Associate at Resources for the Future.

Published: Dec-18-09 | 1 Comment


2010 Oil Spill Adaptation Atlas