Dec18

New Research Tackles Climate Change Governance Impasse

International, Voluntary Programs, Corporate

 

Juice Box image courtesy thingermajig via Flickr This week’s U.N. climate talks highlight the gulf between developed and developing nations. Responsibility for emissions reductions, monitoring, and enforcement are the tragedy of the climate change commons. Despite commitments set, or delayed, in Copenhagen, new research from RFF Vice President and Senior Fellow Mark Cohen and Vanderbilt University Law Professor Michael Vandenbergh suggests that corporate reporting of carbon emissions and carbon product labeling could be crucial tools to help solve the governance dilemma.

 

Major developing countries such as China and India are projected to account for 80 percent of global emissions growth in the next several decades. Meanwhile, carbon-intensive production continues to shift to labor abundant developing nations, creating what economists call leakage. In a forthcoming article published by New York University’s Environmental Law Journal, Climate Change Governance: Boundaries and Leakage, Cohen and Vandenbergh propose corporate carbon footprint disclosure and carbon product labeling as a means to incentivize emissions reductions among suppliers even in the absence of government regulations.

 

“Information disclosure has been called the third wave of environmental regulation,” Cohen said. “There are numerous examples around the world where either facility-level disclosure or product labeling has resulted in significant reductions in pollution without direct regulation.” Vandenbergh states that “there is a growing sense that we need to be creating private incentives for carbon emissions reduction while public measures are developed.”

 

Climate governance proposals are a sour point for international negotiations, especially for emerging economies like China. Cohen and Vandenbergh advise a multi-pronged approach where governments and non-governmental organizations expand upon existing reporting boundaries and product disclosure schemes which tally the total carbon emissions for producing a specific good. The model creates informal social pressures for firms, and consumers who buy their products, to reduce emissions from domestic and global supply chains.

 

Atmospheric carbon targets will not be achieved without the active participation of China and other major developing countries. Market pressures from information disclosure provide an avenue to achieve reductions without exacerbating the political rift between nations.

 

Aysha Ghadiali is a Research Associate at Resources for the Future.

Published: Dec-18-09 | 1 Comment

Jul15

Will Wal-Mart Lead the way on Carbon Labeling?

Voluntary Programs, Waxman-Markey, Disclosure

 

Image Courtesy Cool Business Ideas The movement to disclose carbon content in products could get a tremendous boost from massive retailer Wal-Mart, according to this story from Marc Gunther. He writes:

 

[Wal-Mart] is developing an ambitious, comprehensive, and fiendishly complex plan to measure the sustainability of every product it sells. Wal-Mart has been working quietly on what it calls a "sustainability index" for more than a year, and it will take another year or two for labels to appear on products. But the company's grand plan-"audacious beyond words" is how one insider describes it-has the potential to transform retailing by requiring manufacturers of consumer products to dig deep into their supply chains, measure their environmental impact, and compete on those terms for favorable treatment from the world's most powerful retailer.

 

Wal-Mart and Congress may be on the same wavelength. As Mark Cohen wrote in this earlier post, the Waxman-Markey energy bill—currently working its way through the Senate—includes a provision (Sec. 274) for a program similar to the retail giant is considering.

 

Tracking the amount of carbon that goes into a product throughout its manufacturing and distribution is massive undertaking, unprecedented in the U.S. (see Joel Darmstadter's look at measuring life-cycle carbon for energy sources). But as Mark pointed out there are models to look toward, “Efforts are already underway in the U.K.—where the Carbon Trust is labeling hundreds of products, and Japan where a voluntary program is being tested with 30 major manufacturers.”

 

Tiffany Clements is managing editor of Weathervane.

Published: Jul-15-09 | 0 Comments

May28

A Call for Product Carbon Labeling

Congress, United States, CO2, Voluntary Programs, Waxman-Markey

 

Image Courtesy thingermejig via Flikr

A provision in the Waxman-Markey energy bill—currently making its way from the House Energy and Commerce Committee to a floor vote—calls for a carbon content product disclosure program, similar to ENERGY STAR and other voluntary labeling program. Many of these programs have been shown to reduce adverse environmental impacts through changes in product design and consumer purchasing decisions.


The little-known amendment, inserted by Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisc.), requires the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to establish “a national program for measuring, reporting, publicly disclosing, and labeling products or materials sold in the United States for their carbon content … ” 


Carbon footprint labeling is in its infancy but is expected to grow by leaps and bounds. Efforts are already underway in the U.K.—where the Carbon Trust is labeling hundreds of products, and Japan where a voluntary program is being tested with 30 major manufacturers. 


Even if most consumers do not directly search for “low carbon” products, carbon footprint labels might help drive innovation as companies seek to differentiate their products to “green consumers.”  Large intermediaries such as Tesco, a grocery store chain in the U.K., are beginning to use carbon footprint labels as one of the product attributes they use in deciding which items to stock.

 

Image Courtesy thingermejig via Flikr

Carbon footprint labeling might also be a mechanism that helps reduce leakage without imposing direct border restrictions. By encouraging all products (regardless of where they are produced) to have a carbon label, there will be pressure to reduce the carbon content of products even in countries that have not agreed to greenhouse gas restrictions.


For more on environmental disclosure labeling, check out this post about Senior Fellow Kate Probst's suggestions for tailpipe carbon emissions labeling and Senior Fellow Richard Morgenstern's Weekly Policy Commentary on the effectiveness of voluntary programs. 

 

Mark Cohen is vice president for research at Resources for the Future.

Published: May-28-09 | 1 Comment


2010 Oil Spill Adaptation Atlas