The Impact of Trading on the Costs and Benefits of the Acid Rain Program
A quantification of cost savings from the Acid Rain Program relative to a counterfactual uniform performance standard (UPS) that would have achieved the same aggregate emissions in 2002.
Abstract
We quantify the cost savings from the Acid Rain Program (ARP) by comparing compliance costs for 761 coal-fired generating units under the ARP with compliance costs under a counterfactual uniform performance standard (UPS) that would have achieved the same aggregate emissions in 2002. In 2002, we find compliance costs to be $200 million (1995$) lower and health damages to be $170 million (1995$) lower under the ARP. We also compare health damages associated with observed SO2 emissions from all ARP units in 2002 with damages from a no-trade counterfactual. Damages under the ARP are $2.1 billion (1995$) higher than under the no-trade scenario, reflecting allowance transfers from units in the western US to units in the eastern US with larger exposed populations.
Authors
H. Ron Chan
B. Andrew Chupp
Nicholas Z. Muller
