Today, more than ever, ‘Spaceship Earth’ is an apt metaphor as we chart the boundaries for a safe planet. Social scientists both analyse why society courts disaster by approaching or even overstepping these boundaries and try to design suitable policies to avoid these perils. Because the threats of transgressing planetary boundaries are global, long-run, uncertain and interconnected, they must be analysed together to avoid conflicts and take advantage of synergies. To obtain policies that are effective at both international and local levels requires careful analysis of the underlying mechanisms across scientific disciplines and approaches, and must take politics into account. In this Perspective, we examine the complexities of designing policies that can keep Earth within the biophysical limits favourable to human life.
Policy Design for the Anthropocene
Recent literature on the Anthropocene suggests multiple threats to the resilience of the Earth system. Exceeding the ‘planetary boundaries’ could lead to rapidly increasing risks of catastrophic and/or irreversible environmental change.
Journal Article by Thomas Sterner, Edward Barbier, Ian Bateman, Ottmar Edenhofer, Inge van den Bijgaart, Anne-Sophie Crépin, Ottmar Edenhofer, Carolyn Fischer, Wolfgang Habla, John Hassler, Olof Johansson-Stenman, Andreas Lange, Stephen Polasky, Johan Rockström, Henrik G. Smith, Will Steffen, Gernot Wagner, James Wilen, Francisco Alpízar, Christian Azar, Donna Carless, Carlos Chávez, Jessica Coria, Gustav Engström, Sverker C. Jagers, Gunnar Kohlin, Åsa Lofgren, Håkan Pleijel, and Amanda Robinson — Jan. 10, 2019View Journal Article
Inge van den Bijgaart
Henrik G. Smith
Sverker C. Jagers
New Episode of Resources Radio: A Lawmaker's Take on the Green New Deal, with Former Congressman Phil Sharp
The Problem Oregon Doesn’t Have
Under the current proposed legislation, Oregon would auction most of its emissions allowances, but it would also give some allowances away for free.