Policy makers and policy analysts are frequently faced with situations where it is unclear whether market-based instruments hold real promise of reducing costs, relative to conventional command-and-control approaches. We develop rules-of-thumb that can be employed with minimal amounts of information to estimate the potential cost savings associated with market-based policies, with an application to the environmental policy realm. Our hope is that these simple formulae can aid policy analysts and policy makers in the early stages of exploring alternative policy instruments by helping them identify approaches that merit greater attention and more detailed analysis. We illustrate the use of the rules-of-thumb with an application to nitrogen oxides control in the eastern United States.
Cost Heterogeneity and the Potential Savings from Market-Based Policies
Working Paper by Richard Newell and Robert Stavins — 1 minute read — May 2, 2000
DownloadRelated Content
Journal Article — Dec 31, 2002
Cost Heterogeneity and the Potential Savings from Market-Based Policies
Journal Article — Jul 8, 2021
The GDP-Temperature Relationship: Implications for Climate Change Damages
Two RFF researchers coauthor this journal article evaluating the effect of temperature due to global warming on GDP.
Common Resources — Jun 21, 2021
Empowering Local Communities to Manage Their Forests: Nine New Studies Examine the Ecological and Socioeconomic Effects
Decentralized forest management is often considered to be a valuable tool for ecological and socioeconomic advancement within developing nations. However, recent work has shown that its effectiveness is highly dependent on the quality of local governance.