Science Advisors Reject EPA Use of Controversial Cost-Benefit Method

Date

Jan. 14, 2008

News Type

Media Highlight

Source

Risk Policy Report

Alan Krupnick is quoted regarding his view that the recent Science Advisory Board report to the Environmental Protection Agency will not influence EPA policy until more research is conducted.

Topics

Data and Decision Tools

Related People

Alan Krupnick

Senior Fellow; Director, Industry and Fuels Program

Alan Krupnick is a senior fellow at RFF.

Related Content

In Focus — May 30, 2025

In Focus: Repealing Clean Electricity Tax Credits

In this video, RFF Senior Research Associate McKenna Peplinski discusses the potential effects of repealing tax credits for clean electricity generation.

Media Highlight — Feb 3, 2025

E&E News: “Trump’s 10-for-1 Regs Order Jettisons Rulemaking Revamp”

RFF President and CEO Billy Pizer comments on the revision of Circular A-4, an important piece of federal guidance for cost-benefit analysis.

In Focus — Oct 22, 2024

In Focus: Partisan Views on Climate Change

This video shares insights from polling about how Americans' views on climate change differ depending on political affiliation, with Stanford University Professor and RFF University Fellow Jon Krosnick.

Issue Brief — Jul 10, 2024

The US Department of the Treasury’s Proposed Guidance for the Tech-Neutral Tax Credits

This issue brief outlines the questions answered by the US Department of the Treasury's guidance on technology-neutral tax credits, as well as those that have yet to be addressed.