Plans Affecting the Sage-Grouse: Recalibration or Short-Sighted Economic Grab?

Date

Dec. 19, 2018

News Type

Press Release

WASHINGTON, DC—In a new blog posted today by Resources for the Future (RFF), RFF Fellow Rebecca Epanchin-Niell takes a close-up view of recent federal plans affecting greater sage-grouse conservation and oil and gas activities, delving into the long-running debate about tradeoffs between economic development and species preservation.  

Specifically, plans announced earlier this month by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) would relax restrictions on oil and gas activity across seven states, including exemptions that can allow for drilling in areas with sensitive sage-grouse habitats. The level to which the plans open new areas to oil and gas varies across the states, with some (e.g., Wyoming) greatly relaxing explicit restrictions, while others (e.g., Oregon) effecting no change at all. These changes are amendments to BLM land-use plans that were put in place in 2015 to help protect the greater sage-grouse, preventing the need to list the species under the US Endangered Species Act (ESA).

The new blog is called BLM Sage-Grouse Land Use Plan Changes: A Recalibration or A Short-Sighted Economic Grab?

Dr. Epanchin-Niell states that much of the rhetoric responding to each new twist in the ongoing sage-grouse saga is polarized and extreme. However, there is much nuance and uncertainty, and depends on how development and protections are ultimately rolled out.

Read the full blog post.

Resources for the Future (RFF) is an independent, nonprofit research institution in Washington, DC. Its mission is to improve environmental, energy, and natural resource decisions through impartial economic research and policy engagement. RFF is committed to being the most widely trusted source of research insights and policy solutions leading to a healthy environment and a thriving economy.

Unless otherwise stated, the views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may differ from those of other RFF experts, its officers, or its directors. RFF does not take positions on specific legislative proposals.

For more information, please see our media resources page or contact Media Relations and Communications Specialist Annie McDarris.

Related Content