Keep Climate Policy Focused on the Social Cost of Carbon
An article for Science's Policy Forum argues that a shift from the use of the social cost of carbon and benefit-cost analysis for evaluating policy would be misguided.
In the context of climate change, the application of cost-benefit analysis to inform mitigation policies can help to achieve the best outcomes and avoid the worst: spending trillions of dollars but failing to get the job done (1). The costs of a climate policy are the abatement costs of reducing emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) (or other greenhouse gases). The standard measure of the benefits of a climate policy is the social cost of carbon (SCC), which measures the avoided economic damages associated with a metric ton of CO2 emissions. Recently, however, there have been calls for an alternative approach to policy evaluation that ignores the benefits of avoided climate damages and instead focuses only on minimizing the compliance costs of a given, politically determined climate objective (2, 3). We argue here that a shift from use of the SCC and cost-benefit analysis to an alternative approach for evaluating policy that focuses on costs alone would be misguided. Rather than advocate for alternative approaches, now is the time to support efforts to update the SCC and its application to official climate policy evaluation.
Joseph E. Aldy
Joe Aldy is a university fellow at RFF and professor of the practice of public policy at Harvard’s Kennedy School. His research focuses on climate change policy, energy policy, and mortality risk evaluation.
Matthew J. Kotchen
Robert N. Stavins
Co-Vice Chair, RFF Board of Directors; University Fellow; Professor, Harvard University
Robert Stavins is a university fellow at RFF and the Co-Vice Chair of the RFF Board of Directors. His research focuses on diverse areas of environmental economics and policy.
Common Resources — Dec 21, 2022
RFF’s Top Stories of 2022
As 2022 winds down, the editorial team at Resources for the Future has reviewed the past 12 months of blog posts, magazine articles, and podcast episodes and curated a selection of notable pieces from the year.
Media Highlight — Dec 7, 2022
E&E News: “How EPA Beat the White House on Estimating Climate Damage”
A highlight of RFF’s recent work on a new estimate of the social cost of carbon.
Media Highlight — Nov 17, 2022
Bloomberg: "'No Brainer' Methane Rule Touts New EPA Approach to Carbon Costs"
This article, which cites RFF research and Fellow Brian Prest's expertise, discusses the EPA's recently proposed methane rule and the newly estimated social cost of carbon that it uses.
Common Resources — Nov 15, 2022
The US Environmental Protection Agency Introduces a New Social Cost of Carbon for Public Comment
The US Environmental Protection Agency has introduced an updated approach to estimating the social cost of carbon that incorporates important scientific and statistical advances.