Comments to the US EPA on “Increasing Consistency and Transparency in Considering Costs and Benefits in the Rulemaking Process”

Download

Date

Aug. 10, 2018

Authors

Alan Krupnick, Arthur G. Fraas, Richard D. Morgenstern, and Nathan Richardson

Publication

Testimony and Public Comments

Reading time

1 minute

Authors

Alan Krupnick

Senior Fellow; Director, Industry and Fuels Program

Alan Krupnick is a senior fellow at RFF.

Arthur G. Fraas

Visiting Fellow

Arthur Fraas is a visiting fellow at Resources for the Future. At RFF, Fraas works on a variety of issues related to energy and the environment, including projects looking at issues and tradeoffs with energy efficiency regulations, and more.

Richard D. Morgenstern

Senior Fellow

Richard Morgenstern is a senior fellow at RFF. His research focuses on the economic analysis of environmental issues with an emphasis on the costs, benefits, evaluation, and design of environmental policies.

Nathan Richardson

University Fellow

Nathan Richardson is an attorney and university fellow at RFF, where he specializes in environmental law and economics.

Related Content

EPA’s ANPRM on Increasing Consistency and Transparency in Benefit Cost Analysis

We consider some items in the Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for EPA’s cost-benefit analysis to be contrary to best economic practice and/o...

2026 Transportation Engineering, Economics, and Policy Workshop

How Will Changes to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Affect Long-Term Contracts?

Long-term contracts benefit the development of clean energy. Proposed changes to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol could disrupt this status quo.

From Risk to Reward: Insurance Discounts for Wildfire Mitigation

This paper analyzes how insurance companies comply with recent California regulations and the factors that underpin the wildfire discounts they offer.