Carbon Standards Examined: A Comparison of At-the-Source and Beyond-the-Source Power Plant Carbon Standards
The replacement to the Clean Power Plan could increase emissions at many facilities and in several states compared to having no power plant carbon standard.
The proposed replacement rule for the US Clean Power Plan, named the Affordable Clean Energy Rule, employs a narrow “at-the-source” approach that targets heat rate improvements at individual coal plants. The emissions rebound and state-level implications of this type of policy are not well understood. We analyze the potential effects of a similar at-the-source policy scenario on national and state emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOX) in 2030 using 2014 results from the Integrated Planning Model (IPM). Compared to a no-policy scenario, we find that an at-the-source scenario that provides an average fleet wide heat rate improvement of 4 percent for coal-fired power plants could result in only a modest decrease (-2.6 percent) in national power sector CO2 emissions, with potential increases in CO2 emissions in eight states totaling three million additional tons of CO2 emissions per year in those states. We decompose the CO2 emissions changes and find evidence of a rebound effect, in which coal plants that become more efficient operate more often. The scenario also results in a modest estimated increase (2.7 percent) in national SO2 emissions and a minor estimated reduction (-2.3 percent) in national NOX emissions, with increases in one or both pollutants in 12 states. Estimated emissions in 2030 are substantially higher under an at-the-source scenario for CO2 (63 percent), SO2 (88 percent), and NOx (56 percent) compared to a more flexible “beyond-the-source” scenario that resembles the Clean Power Plan. Our analysis suggests that a strong possibility of emissions rebound exists for at-the-source power plant standards, leading to increased CO2 and co-pollutant emissions at multiple scales that could degrade air quality and cause adverse health effects. The results reinforce the importance of analyzing both changes in power plant utilization as well as CO2 and co-pollutant emissions at the plant, state, regional and national scale when proposing to weaken emission standards.
- The Trump administration’s proposed Affordable Clean Energy Rule narrowly targets efficiency improvements at individual coal plants.
- Detailed modeling shows this type of policy leads to a rebound effect, increasing the use of coal facilities.
- We find the unintended consequence that emissions of CO2 and local air pollutants SO2 and NOX may increase in some states.
- This type of policy may make meeting state climate goals costlier and may degrade air quality and cause adverse health effects.
- Compared to the CPP, the replacement rule could substantially increase emissions of CO2, SO2 and NOX.
Dallas Burtraw is a Darius Gaskins senior fellow at RFF. Burtraw’s research includes analysis of the distributional and regional consequences of climate policy and the evolution of electricity markets including renewable integration.
Common Resources — Nov 19, 2021
Breathe Easy: Smartphone Apps Can Reduce Exposure to Air Pollution
Training in the use of air quality mobile apps may be an effective means of reducing adverse health effects of severe air pollution in developing countries, where air pollution has the most significant impact on human health.