Implementation of Policy Instruments for Chlorinated Solvents: A Comparison of Design Standards, Bans, and Taxes to Phase Out Trichloroethylene

Download

Date

Sept. 1, 2001

Authors

Daniel Slunge and Thomas Sterner

Publication

Working Paper

Reading time

1 minute

This paper studies the Swedish prohibition of the hazardous solvent Trichloroethylene (TCE).Sweden is alone in completely prohibiting its use. The ban has been at best a partial success andillustrates the dilemmas of policymaking. Use has declined but not stopped, largely because the decisionto ban TCE was challenged in the courts. Recently, the EU Court of Justice decided in favor of Sweden’sright to have a ban. This article analyzes abatement cost data to show that the cost of replacing TCE islow for most plants, although there appear to be a few firms for which it may be quite high. A crosscountrycomparison indicates that the Swedish ban was less effective than the very strict technicalrequirements in Germany or the tax used in Norway. A tax (or deposit refund scheme) would be a goodmechanism to achieve a swift phaseout.

Authors

Related Content