Marine protected areas (MPAs) are currently receiving considerable attention as a "new" tool to control overexploitation. Many advocates argue that MPAs will provide a plethora of benefits ranging from improved habitat to higher fish stocks with little costs. Fishermen argue, not surprisingly, that the costs resulting from closing areas could be significant and need to be considered in the debate. In this paper, a set of biological, industry, and management hypotheses drawn from the literature analyzing the effects of MPAs are discussed. In doing so, a framework is presented that can be used to assess the expected returns to society from investing in MPAs.
Marine Protected Areas as Fishery Policy: A Discussion of the Potential Costs and Benefits
Working Paper by James Sanchirico — 1 minute read — May 1, 2000
DownloadRelated Content
Journal Article — Jul 8, 2021
The GDP-Temperature Relationship: Implications for Climate Change Damages
Two RFF researchers coauthor this journal article evaluating the effect of temperature due to global warming on GDP.
Common Resources — Jun 21, 2021
Empowering Local Communities to Manage Their Forests: Nine New Studies Examine the Ecological and Socioeconomic Effects
Decentralized forest management is often considered to be a valuable tool for ecological and socioeconomic advancement within developing nations. However, recent work has shown that its effectiveness is highly dependent on the quality of local governance.
Resources Radio — Jun 8, 2021
Experiments in Sustainable Development, with Kelsey Jack
Kelsey Jack describes strategies to both protect environmental health and support low-income households in developing nations.