In developing countries such as Ethiopia, rural households spend a considerable part of their time in agriculture as well as resource collection. However, rigorous empirical studies on the impacts of scarcity of environmental resources on productive activities such as agriculture are very limited—in developing countries in general and Africa in particular. Using a panel data set collected from Ethiopia, this paper examines the effect of scarcity of fuelwood and water on time spent in agriculture. The results of the empirical analysis show that fuelwood scarcity, as reflected by the shadow price of fuelwood, has a negative and significant impact on time spent on agriculture. This suggests that addressing fuelwood scarcity has the potential to improve agricultural production, as well as other benefits. The results also indicate that scarcity of water has no effect on time spent on agriculture, suggesting that any lost time due to water scarcity probably comes out of other activities. The role of other conditioning variables on labor input to agriculture was also examined.
The Impact of Natural Resource Scarcity on Agriculture in Ethiopia
Working Paper by Alemu Mekonnen, Abebe Damte, and Rahel Deribe — 1 minute read — June 18, 2015
DownloadAuthors
Alemu Mekonnen
Abebe Damte
Rahel Deribe
Related Content
Common Resources — Jul 7, 2021
Empowering American Landowners with Carbon Credits
The Growing Climate Solutions Act—passed in the Senate and currently awaiting action in the House—can help facilitate sustainable practices among landowners by providing the opportunity to buy and sell carbon credits.
Webinar — May 25, 2021
Paying for Carbon: Measuring Climate Solutions in Agriculture
An in-depth discussion on carbon farming and accurately measuring greenhouse gases stored in agricultural soils
Press Release — May 17, 2021
As the Planet Warms, Mortality Could Rise—Along with the Social Cost of Carbon
In a new analysis of 70 papers, RFF Fellow Daniel Raimi weighs research on how climate change may affect temperature-related mortality—and notes holes in the data—to improve estimates of the social cost of carbon.