Partisanship and Proximity Predict Opposition to Fracking in Colorado
A detailed analysis of community perceptions of oil and gas development in Colorado, using real-world voting data.
Oil and gas development has grown rapidly in recent years in the United States, generating substantial debate over its risks and benefits. A large body of research has surveyed individuals living in and around producing regions to evaluate their views on the industry, with somewhat mixed results. Here, we present the first detailed analysis on this topic using real-world voting data, drawing from precinct-level results of a 2018 election in Colorado that included a vote on Proposition 112, which would have set very large setback requirements on new oil and gas activity. We find partisan affiliation correlates very strongly with support for oil and gas development, that voters in precincts with higher levels of oil and gas activity are modestly more supportive of the industry, but that this support weakens in precincts where development has grown most rapidly.
Daniel Raimi is a fellow and director of the Equity in the Energy Transition Initiative at RFF where he works on a range of energy policy issues with a focus on tools to enable an equitable energy transition.
Director, Payne Institute, Professor of Public Policy, Colorado School of Mines
Resources Radio — Jan 25, 2022
California Crude: Seeking a Just Transition in the Golden State, with Kyle Meng
Kyle Meng explores California’s oil and gas industry and how new policies can be designed to minimize emissions while supporting impacted communities.
On the Issues — Jan 21, 2022
Subsidies for Electric Vehicles, Sea Level Rise in Museums, and More
A biweekly newsletter connecting global current events, pressing climate and energy policy news, and economics research from RFF scholars. This week: Subsidies for electric vehicles, sea level rise in museums, and more.