Comments to the EPA on "Increasing Consistency and Transparency in Considering Benefits and Costs in the Clean Air Act Rulemaking Process”
Comments in response to the EPA's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) requesting comment on “Increasing Consistency and Transparency in Considering Costs and Benefits in the Clean Air Act Rulemaking Process” (85 FR 35612)
On June 11, 2020, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) requesting comment on “Increasing Consistency and Transparency in Considering Costs and Benefits in the Clean Air Act Rulemaking Process” (85 FR 35612). We begin by noting we agree with the overall view presented in the NPRM that benefit-cost analysis is an important tool for EPA decisionmaking, as the government-wide policy of every president since Ronald Reagan has required it (when consistent with statute). We applaud efforts to improve the quality, consistency, and transparency of that analysis. However, some suggested policy changes in the NPRM are, in our view, contrary to best economic practice, existing law, or both, and therefore will not further the NPRM’s stated objectives. Other proposals in the NPRM, while not directly counterproductive, appear to have little discernible benefit and simply constitute a waste of government resources. Further, we support adding to this document specific provisions establishing requirements for the selection and conduct of retrospective analyses.
To read the full comments, click "download," above.
Richard D. Morgenstern
Richard Morgenstern is a senior fellow at RFF. His research focuses on the economic analysis of environmental issues with an emphasis on the costs, benefits, evaluation, and design of environmental policies.
Arthur G. Fraas
Arthur Fraas is a visiting fellow at Resources for the Future. At RFF, Fraas works on a variety of issues related to energy and the environment, including projects looking at issues and tradeoffs with energy efficiency regulations, and more.
Common Resources — Nov 19, 2021
Breathe Easy: Smartphone Apps Can Reduce Exposure to Air Pollution
Training in the use of air quality mobile apps may be an effective means of reducing adverse health effects of severe air pollution in developing countries, where air pollution has the most significant impact on human health.
Common Resources — Nov 5, 2021
The Supreme Court’s New Threat to Climate Policy
The US Supreme Court has agreed to take up a new case on the Environmental Protection Agency’s authority to regulate greenhouse gases. That’s bad news for ambitious climate policy—and potentially for the power of administrative agencies more generally.