The Fiscal Implications of the US Transition Away from Fossil Fuels
This working paper estimates the fiscal risk posed by the energy transition for governments dependent on fossil fuels, while examining policies to address this risk to revenues.
The need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions requires curtailing coal, oil, and natural gas production and consumption. However, these fuels are major revenue sources for governments. Here we develop a novel estimate of the revenues generated by fossil fuels for all governments in the United States, then estimate how those revenues change under three stylized policy scenarios through 2050: business-as-usual, 2°C, and 1.5°C. We estimate that fossil fuels generate $138 billion annually for all US governments and that these revenues are likely to decline even in the absence of new climate policy. Petroleum product taxes are the largest source and decline under all scenarios. Oil and gas production, the second largest, is relatively stable under the BAU and 2°C scenarios but declines rapidly under the 1.5°C scenario. Under all scenarios, coal revenues decline rapidly, approaching zero by 2040 under the 1.5°C and 2°C scenarios. Recent estimates of climate damages easily exceed the revenue losses described in this analysis, highlighting the need for policymakers to adopt emissions reduction strategies while also addressing revenue shortfalls, which will be concentrated in certain regions. The policy tools to accomplish both goals are relatively straightforward, but implementing them will require overcoming considerable political challenges.
To read the full working paper, click "Download" above.
To read the appendix to the working paper, click "Appendix" below.
Daniel Raimi is a fellow and director of the Equity in the Energy Transition Initiative at RFF where he works on a range of energy policy issues with a focus on tools to enable an equitable energy transition.
Gilbert E. Metcalf
Gilbert E. Metcalf is a university fellow at RFF. His current research focuses on policy evaluation and design in the area of energy and climate change.
Sophie Pesek is a research analyst at RFF. She currently supports projects concerning development of a new land use model and ongoing research on a just energy transition.
Resources Radio — Jan 25, 2022
California Crude: Seeking a Just Transition in the Golden State, with Kyle Meng
Kyle Meng explores California’s oil and gas industry and how new policies can be designed to minimize emissions while supporting impacted communities.
Common Resources — Jan 21, 2022
Is There a Trade-off Between Equity and Effectiveness for Electric Vehicle Subsidies?
A new analysis from Resources for the Future shows that subsidies for electric vehicles are more equitable when aimed at lower incomes. Though all the subsidies here tend to benefit lower-income households, the income-based subsidy is most progressive.