Looking at Federal Environmental Regulating Agencies

Through eight analyses, Resources for the Future offers a road map for institutionalizing retrospective analysis as a standard component of regulatory evaluation.

Resources for the Future (RFF) has developed seven analyses addressing key challenges in advancing retrospective analysis of environmental regulations. These efforts focus on three central themes: exploring institutional pathways to expand the use of retrospective analysis, including potential legislative and executive measures; demonstrating its application through new quantitative studies across various US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulatory domains; and evaluating how the EPA incorporates environmental justice considerations into its regulatory assessments. This type of backward-looking study can underline the effects of a given regulation on different communities, regions, and industries and highlight adverse outcomes and conflicts with other federal regulations.

Although much of the current work centers on regulations under the Clean Air Act, interest has been growing in applying retrospective analysis to areas such as the evaluation of toxic substances in drinking water. However, the lack of a mandatory framework has led to inconsistent implementation, often influenced by discretionary priorities and variable academic funding.

Whereas the US Congress previously had viable prospects to mandate a formal program for retrospective analysis, such prospects have diminished more recently. Nevertheless, the authors who contributed to this body of work have examined a range of administrative pathways, from incremental legislative actions to initiatives that could be pursued by the current administration without congressional involvement.

The RFF project to promote retrospective analysis of environmental regulations adds to a growing effort to introduce greater rigor and accountability in the federal regulatory process.

At an RFF webinar in February 2025, these papers were presented, featuring researchers as they examined a variety of rules affecting major industrial sectors and proposed possible arrangements to more consistently embed retrospective analysis within federal agencies’ standard practice.

Authors

Related Content